Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
You're in denial. You need to come with about ten more examples, because we came up with more than ten examples without breaking a sweat.
The right has had enough of being insulted by the supercilious and hypocritical left.
The current dim-retard governor of Virginia won the election by painting his Republican adversary as a red-neck racist, and look at who the fuck was caught wearing black face in college -- and that lying, hypocritical POS is still in office.
Since Trump took office, or take it back earlier to when he first started campaigning to be POTUS, there have probably been MILLIONS of articles written about him or news reports/discussions on him. A very small handful have made comparisons between him and Hitler. Probably less than .0000001%.
Your statement:
"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."
It's hell to have short term memory...from one post to the next!!
You sure it's not .00000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000001%
If you're going to feign memory lose might as well go BIG.
Can we classify you now as a BULLSHITER??
Your percentage is <1 article in 10 MILLION!!
SR -Quote - Since Trump took office, or take it back earlier to when he first started campaigning to be POTUS, there have probably been MILLIONS of articles written about him or news reports/discussions on him. A very small handful have made comparisons between him and Hitler. Probably less than .0000001%.
Show some factual support for that number - or admit is just a personal opinion fabrication.
Look at the posts - including from some on vacation - labeling Trump and non-DPST's as nazi hitlers -on this forum.
You are on an untenable argument.
Since Trump took office, or take it back earlier to when he first started campaigning to be POTUS, there have probably been MILLIONS of articles written about him or news reports/discussions on him. A very small handful have made comparisons between him and Hitler. Probably less than .0000001%.
Your statement:
"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."
Simply not true, or even close to it.
Even MSNBC has admitted to what you choose to disingenuously and dishonestly ignore:
Quote:
Pundits and candidates alike are now accusing Donald Trump of being a fascist or neo-Nazi. Some are even comparing him to Adolf Hitler...
There are three qualities to Trump’s presidential campaign that invoke parallels to Nazism.
It's hell to have short term memory...from one post to the next!!
You sure it's not .00000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000001%
If you're going to feign memory lose might as well go BIG.
Can we classify you now as a BULLSHITER??
Your percentage is <1 article in 10 MILLION!!
Is there a point you made there? My point is the number of references to Trump/Hitler made either in news media is so rare it can barely be counted. Yes it happens. Is it significant? No.
Even MSNBC has admitted to what you choose to disingenuously and dishonestly ignore:
Did you happen to notice that the article names NO ONE specifically!! I read both the NY Times and the local newspaper today and although there are several articles on Trump, not one compared him to Hitler.
And do you still stand by your "almost everyone" statement? I could agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.
"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."
A post today in another thread made the comparison.
SR- do not take a cue from the DPST leadership re the Collusion narrative - Leftist comparisons to Hitler and Nazi are a favorite DPST ploy -
How about- rather than being in Denial - admit it happens, and perhaps consider a statement that those comparisons are not appropriate.
Not any more appropriate than comparing Pelosi to Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Kim.
Perhaps????
A post by someone in a hooker board forum is not even worth mentioning. It has happened several times before by certain individuals.
I said it happens but so infrequently as to not even be a factor in campaign rhetoric. If people want to compare Pelosi to Lenin, Staling, Mao, and Kim I have no problem with it. Read what is written/said and don't automatically dismiss the comments.
Did you happen to notice that the article names NO ONE specifically!! I read both the NY Times and the local newspaper today and although there are several articles on Trump, not one compared him to Hitler.
And do you still stand by your "almost everyone" statement? I could agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.
"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."
The point is that even MSNBC recognizes what you won't admit. The references and comparisons are so ubiquitous (meaning specific references are not needed) that even a lib-retard outfit like MSNBC concedes what is common knowledge to all who are intelligent and willing to see reality and truth.
It is a self defense mechanism - they are brutally hateful towards him so he must fight back. We are in a cold civil war so we can't be nice guys to the liberals who want to enslave us.
Let's be honest. He completely brought it on himself. He won the election and then kept on talking out of his ass about anyone and everyone who wasn't in step with him.
Had he just learned to nor tweet about every thought that went into his head, he would not have to be so up in arms.
...there have probably been MILLIONS of articles written about him or news reports/discussions on him. A very small handful have made comparisons between him and Hitler. Probably less than .0000001%.
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
The references and comparisons are so ubiquitous... that even a lib-retard outfit like MSNBC concedes what is common knowledge to all who are intelligent and willing to see reality and truth.
Speedy, you need to pick your fights more carefully!
The constant left-wing media refrain that Trump is as dangerous as Hitler has been so ubiquitous that I even started a thread about it:
As you can see, the WSJ made fun of this crazy, hysterical narrative. The WSJ doesn't usually bother to write editorials ridiculing opinions that are held and expressed by only a tiny, tiny sliver of journalists.
They cited specific examples of Trump-Hitler comparisons made by leading media publications - Vox, the Atlantic, WaPo. And that was over a year ago.
As you can see, the WSJ made fun of this crazy, hysterical narrative. The WSJ doesn't usually bother to write editorials ridiculing opinions that are held and expressed by only a tiny, tiny sliver of journalists.
They cited specific examples of Trump-Hitler comparisons made by leading media publications - Vox, the Atlantic, WaPo. And that was over a year ago.
They are comparing Trump to Hitler, lol. Hitler was supposedly responsible for killing Six Million People and Trump has insulted Six Million People, who by the way probably deserved it. To Liberals thats a valid comparison, lol.
Did you happen to notice that the article names NO ONE specifically!! I read both the NY Times and the local newspaper today and although there are several articles on Trump, not one compared him to Hitler.
And do you still stand by your "almost everyone" statement? I could agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.
"It's obvious you don't read newspapers or listen to the lame-stream talking heads on the radio or TV. Otherwise, you would have heard almost everyone of them refer to Trump as Hitler and call those who voted for him fascists, racists, unintelligent, illiterate, uneducated, etc., ad nauseam day-after-day; night-after-night for more than two years now."
today the Trump-Hitler narrative is wearing thin. they tried it before and after the election, for two years. they had to move on because none of their grave and dire predictions came true.
in fact the media overwhelmingly did compare Trump to Hitler. but guess what?
they are still doing it
note the date on this article ..
Updated 4:04 PM ET, Wed March 20, 2019
that's not last year or two years ago. Barely two months ago ..
Top House Democrats compare Trump's rise to Hitler's
Does the left really want their first openly gay candidate to be named ' Booty-Keg ' ?
Kind of like picking two puppets without genitals which are operated by someone with a hand up their ass to be icons of gay couples.
