Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163231
Yssup Rider60955
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48654
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42591
CryptKicker37218
The_Waco_Kid37010
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-26-2012, 07:24 PM   #226
SpeedRacerXXX
Valued Poster
 
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Georgetown, Texas
Posts: 9,317
Encounters: 2
Default

"Last, but not least, where did I say you were trying "overturn some Texas laws"?"


From your post #122 in this thread:

My statement that you quoted : "FWIW, the "Castle Law" is one of the gun laws with which I disagree. My opinion is that if you are going to try to take someone else's life, your life should be threatened. And in this case the homeowner's life was not threatened."

Your response: "You are now living in Texas. You might want to keep "your New York law" to yourself."

From your post #139:

In other words, I don't just pick on folks with MBA's from New York, who come down here to Texas (or California) and try to give us advice on how things out to be run ... particularly when it comes to guns and shootings ....

Those 2 statements sure look like your telling me that I shouldn't be trying to change the Texas laws. And regarding your statement:

With regard to homes .... long before Mr. Wentworth became a State Senator Texas had self-defense and defense of property laws that allowed home owners and property owners to use deadly force to protect themselves, protect other people, and to protect their property. You were referencing home intrusions/invasions in your "true story"!

I agree with that statement. The question is when did Texas amend the law to allow homeowners to shoot and ask questions later in their home? In looking at it further, the Castle Law was expanded in 1995 after originating in 1973. I would still consider 1995 to be the fairly recent past. To me, when the current Castle Law came into existence has zero relevance to the discussion -- 1973, 1995 or 2007. If you consider 1995 the distant past and want to call my original statement wrong, feel free to do so. The law exists and I recognize it as the law. And I never said otherwise.
SpeedRacerXXX is offline   Quote
Old 12-26-2012, 07:31 PM   #227
Guest042416
Account Disabled
 
Guest042416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 15, 2012
Location: too much traveling to know
Posts: 3,988
Encounters: 20
Default

ya all great puss in texas, but ya all some fuccked up racist gun owners down there that think the civil war is still going on.
ya all lost da war baby.
Guest042416 is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 07:35 AM   #228
Budman
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Budman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 12, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,908
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjwstw View Post
ya all great puss in texas, but ya all some fuccked up racist gun owners down there that think the civil war is still going on.
ya all lost da war baby.

You are a fool. Try writing in english next time.
Budman is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 08:01 AM   #229
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,955
Encounters: 67
Default

All that said, there are a whole shitload of Texas laws that need overturning. Even if you take guns off the table (and put them into your little man purses, where they belong.)
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 08:23 AM   #230
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

[QUOTE=SpeedRacerXXX;1052109867]"Last, but not least, where did I say you were trying "overturn some Texas laws"?"




The question is when did Texas amend the law to allow homeowners to shoot and ask questions later in their home? [/QUOTE]

Until some media hound dubbed or nicknamed a self-defense law as being a "Castle Law" (which sounds rather medival to me), the provisions of the Texas Penal Code were in place regarding self-defense and the case law interpretation of the same. It was not "new law" in Texas until the Model Penal Code was adopted, which was apparently before you were born. Someone along the way thought it would be "appropriate" to amend with a provision that one has to be able to "retreat" from a threat and the case law pretty much shit-canned that in regard to homes (aka Castles??) .. which is what the original scenario was about ....

there is NO LAW in TEXAS that ...

..."allow homeowners to shoot and ask questions later in their home."

That is some Yankee MDA spin on a Texas self-defense law.

FYI: A codification of prevailing case law interpretation in the State merely establishes consistencey throughout the State to assure that a person from Houston will get treated the same as a person in Cedar Park and vice versa, rather than depending upon the DA, a Judge, or a Jury, and gives clarity to the "majority" opinion throughout the State. That does not make it "new" law ... it's an amendment to "old law" and "clarification" by codification of existing law as announced by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and various Courts of Appeal in Texas.

I'll cut Jeff some slack and say it may have been "new" to him, but he practiced little criminal law as a full time practicing attorney and at least that wasn't his "strong suit" before he jumped into politics. So if he tried to take credit for crafting and sponsoring "new law" in his campaign, I can see where that might get bought by someone who also has practiced little or no cimrinal law.

Back to shooting people legally who kick your doors in the middle of the night.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 08:29 AM   #231
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
All that said, there are a whole shitload of Texas laws that need overturning.
Memo: The one you have been concerned about was overturned by the SCOTUS.

It's ok to sodomize your BF now in Texas in the "privacy of your "castle"...

..... without criminal prosecution. Enjoy ... guilt free sodomy, YR.

Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 09:56 AM   #232
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

I am sure you do that daily LL...
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 12:50 PM   #233
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
I am sure you do that daily LL...
If it takes posting it to remind you daily that you no longer have feel guilty about it ...

well... yes I will. But if you still feel guilty about sodomizing your BF ...

then it's a waste of time to keep reminding you that it's lawful now in Texas. Oh, wait. You're in Kansas ... it never was unlawful there, right? So, that's why you're still there!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-27-2012, 02:23 PM   #234
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
If it takes posting it to remind you daily that you no longer have feel guilty about it ...

well... yes I will. But if you still feel guilty about sodomizing your BF ...

then it's a waste of time to keep reminding you that it's lawful now in Texas. Oh, wait. You're in Kansas ... it never was unlawful there, right? So, that's why you're still there!

You were the one bringing this perversion up you won't find anywhere that I do it.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 12:26 AM   #235
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
You were the one bringing this perversion up you won't find anywhere that I do it.
Nor do I. But the SCOTUS decision can be relevant to the "integrity of one's home" ...

.. if it's okay for you to put one in your BF's ass in the "sanctity" of your home ....

I ought to be able to put a couple in his chest if he kicks down the "back door" and invades the "sanctity" of my home.

"Had those who drew and ratified the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth Amendment or the Fourteenth Amendment known the components of liberty in its manifold possibilities, they might have been more specific. They did not presume to have this insight. They knew times can blind us to certain truths and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress. As the Constitution endures, persons in every generation can invoke its principles in their own search for greater freedom."


Lawrence vs. Texas, 539 U.S. at 18 (2003).
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 03:10 AM   #236
Randy4Candy
Valued Poster
 
Randy4Candy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 30, 2009
Location: Hwy 380 Revisited
Posts: 3,333
Encounters: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Still no substance to the topic:

... "GUNS DON'T KILL" ...

Are you still trying to divert attention from ...

... your ignorance?
LexusBlubber, please show me where I am in favor of banning all guns. I'll save you some time (and exertion of your limited capacity to read and understand) - I never have. Don't bother to cut'n'paste unless you do what you do best with the complete statement- in context.

You are using the typical Teawipe ploy of accusing those who disagree with you and point out your defective thought processes - accusing them of doing what you do. Screw all your talk about MBAs, go get that GED, boy.
Randy4Candy is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 03:42 AM   #237
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy4Candy View Post
... please show me where I am in favor of banning all guns. ....
SweetCheeks, where did I say ....

..... you were "in favor of banning all guns"?

You're not one of those posters are you?
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 05:12 AM   #238
Randy4Candy
Valued Poster
 
Randy4Candy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 30, 2009
Location: Hwy 380 Revisited
Posts: 3,333
Encounters: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
SweetCheeks, where did I say ....

..... you were "in favor of banning all guns"?

You're not one of those posters are you?
LexusBlubber, go back and re-read your first personal attack on me and my post that precipitated your ill-reasoned ire. Since you're a Teawipe Parrotriot and all about "personal responsibility," why don't you man up and take a little.

The list grows for your New Year's Resolutions:
1. Get a GED
2. Learn to read for contextual understanding
3. Quit projecting your motivations and actions on others
4. Find a good psychotherapist for anger management and self-image issues

There remains the bright side to all of this: you can STILL kiss my ass.
Randy4Candy is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 06:36 AM   #239
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy4Candy View Post
blah, blah, blah.
I see you can't. Enough said. Oh ...

... it's not a personal attack if it is true.

It's "just the facts, ma'am."
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 07:32 AM   #240
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Nor do I. But the SCOTUS decision can be relevant to the "integrity of one's home" ...

.. if it's okay for you to put one in your BF's ass in the "sanctity" of your home ....

I ought to be able to put a couple in his chest if he kicks down the "back door" and invades the "sanctity" of my home.

"Had those who drew and ratified the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth Amendment or the Fourteenth Amendment known the components of liberty in its manifold possibilities, they might have been more specific. They did not presume to have this insight. They knew times can blind us to certain truths and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress. As the Constitution endures, persons in every generation can invoke its principles in their own search for greater freedom."


Lawrence vs. Texas, 539 U.S. at 18 (2003).

Now you are shooting your BF ?You are a strange dude..
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved