Encounter: Tot-Ally Amazing

[DonkeyKongJr]

Date: 1/25
Name: Ally
Phone: +1 (682) 701-5963
Email Address: Text
URL / Website: Mizzkim
City: Dallas
State: Texas
Address: Studio row
Activities: Everything except Greek
Hair Length and Color: Dark medium length
Age: Late 20s, 30s
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: Asian
Physical Description: Just like the photos plus some soft curves. She is a petite brick house with emasculate proportions. Super supple Ds that stack up side by side & stride for stride with anime anatomy.Sexy Full lips above & below.
Recommendation: yes

[DonkeyKongJr]

Immaculate proportions for fucks sake, not “emasculate” haha

[Sum-yang]

Very good juicy details and still concise.

[DonkeyKongJr]

Thank you kindly Sum-Yang. This style of review writing differs from the norm and unfortunately comes with caveats.
My latest review for “Mio” was subsequently rejected by the moderators for being incomplete and lacking sufficient detail…
I obviously have a knack for words, so why the lack of tick-for-tack descriptive detail?
The reason I shy away from graphic play-by-play detail is to avoid painting colorful descriptions of communal K-girls, taking the full brunt of my 3rd Leg. Tales of cervix pummeling & DonkeyKongJr Va-JJ stretching usually don’t gel with fellow hobbyists and thus are mindfully 86ed out of the mix.
Disclosing those sorts of details has an inadvertent way of provoking feelings of inadequacy and turning chuckles & smiles into sour grapes. Nobody gets themselves in a hurry to go see a girl after reading some shit like that. so…
I do my best to work around the issue & instead contribute honest and accurate information regarding the actual service, and the girls themselves… I personally would rather not provoke unnecessary contempt with “Spleen Rearranging” & “Tonsil Tickling” play-by-play reviews…make sense ?

[BoneHome777]

Originally Posted by DonkeyKongJr

Thank you kindly Sum-Yang. This style of review writing differs from the norm and unfortunately comes with caveats.
My latest review for “Mio” was subsequently rejected by the moderators for being incomplete and lacking sufficient detail…
I obviously have a knack for words, so why the lack of tick-for-tack descriptive detail?
The reason I shy away from graphic play-by-play detail is to avoid painting colorful descriptions of communal K-girls, taking the full brunt of my 3rd Leg. Tales of cervix pummeling & DonkeyKongJr Va-JJ stretching usually don’t gel with fellow hobbyists and thus are mindfully 86ed out of the mix.
Disclosing those sorts of details has an inadvertent way of provoking feelings of inadequacy and turning chuckles & smiles into sour grapes. Nobody gets themselves in a hurry to go see a girl after reading some shit like that. so…
I do my best to work around the issue & instead contribute honest and accurate information regarding the actual service, and the girls themselves… I personally would rather not provoke unnecessary contempt with “Spleen Rearranging” & “Tonsil Tickling” play-by-play reviews…make sense ?

WTF?

[AspenCalifornia]

Originally Posted by BoneHome777

WTF?

My thoughts exactly.........


The time and effort he took to explain why he wrote a weird, gimmicky review......could have been applied to writing an actual useful review. But to each his own!