Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Kansas and Missouri > Kansas City Metro > Coed Discussions
test
Coed Discussions Hobby-related discussions belong here. Let's keep these discussions on-topic, thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining!

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 316
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 303
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 263
Top Posters
DallasRain71374
biomed168074
Yssup Rider62981
gman4455087
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49558
WTF48272
pyramider46430
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid40152
CryptKicker37405
Mokoa36512
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34744

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-01-2012, 11:11 AM   #46
Guest121212
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 6416
Join Date: Jan 7, 2010
Location: ·
Posts: 2,296
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SillyGirl View Post
So there is some stand taking. Hmmm. Here is the issue Mr Monk. You won't give up personal info? Yet you went from newbie to having references. Which means your refs don't screen. So, for us paranoid ladies, you don't have any valid refs. You just put a lid on your options. I am super newbie friendly, because I do research. A lot of it. And maybe some people are dumb enough to fall for a fake receptionist but it is really pretty basic to check the business first. The amount of prep work involved in creating a fake business that will pass a check guarantees that it won't happen.
My point exactly, in another thread.

As for the issue of the OP (Verify Him) I don't find it of little value (as others have stated), I find it worthless. To call it a tool for a private investigator would be an insult to any investigator.
Guest121212 is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 11:38 AM   #47
KenMonk
Premium Access
 
KenMonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 4, 2011
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri
Posts: 3,289
Encounters: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SillyGirl View Post
So there is some stand taking. Hmmm. Here is the issue Mr Monk. You won't give up personal info? Yet you went from newbie to having references. Which means your refs don't screen. So, for us paranoid ladies, you don't have any valid refs. You just put a lid on your options. I am super newbie friendly, because I do research. A lot of it. And maybe some people are dumb enough to fall for a fake receptionist but it is really pretty basic to check the business first. The amount of prep work involved in creating a fake business that will pass a check guarantees that it won't happen. And it is really silly to call verifyhim a PI tool. This has been around for a while, I'm guessing these girls don't hve PR access. I've looked at it and found it be of little value. But it isn't hard or expensive to dig up a birthdate either.

I didn't call verify him a PI tool, Bambii said she uses a PI tool and didn't give the name. That is what I was talking about. From there I was screened by my first provider who I was referred to by people on here. So I was screened, and used her as a reference which will and has allowed me to see anothe provider. Would it make everyone involved feel better if I simply signed up for P411? If that is what it takes I would do it, but when a provider wants to use a PI site as she stated she used it means she wants my info and that concerns me a little bit. While maybe I took too hard of a stand, I am just shocked someone would want to use a PI site.

I still maintain I would like to see different providers, and again I say if I have to have p411 to see you for example SG I would set it up.
KenMonk is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 11:39 AM   #48
KenMonk
Premium Access
 
KenMonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 4, 2011
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri
Posts: 3,289
Encounters: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie Devlin View Post
My point exactly, in another thread.

As for the issue of the OP (Verify Him) I don't find it of little value (as others have stated), I find it worthless. To call it a tool for a private investigator would be an insult to any investigator.

I don't know what PI's use, and she is the one that said she used a PI tool be it her calling that site a PI tool or not I had no clue about it.

Oh and the OP said later all she wants is a reference and an email addy so I don't know why she would even say she used a PI program or whatever. Just saying everything about the OP sounded fishy to me and a lot of others because it was brought up in length in private.
KenMonk is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 02:18 PM   #49
Omahan
Secretary of State
 
Omahan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,733
Default

Much ado about nothing. Getting verified is only a problem for newbies. You suffer through it for a while and then - - you have REFERENCES! Life is good again!
Omahan is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 02:23 PM   #50
guest010313
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 48112
Join Date: Oct 5, 2010
Location: Reno
Posts: 2,037
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KenMonk View Post
I didn't call verify him a PI tool, Bambii said she uses a PI tool and didn't give the name. That is what I was talking about. From there I was screened by my first provider who I was referred to by people on here. So I was screened, and used her as a reference which will and has allowed me to see anothe provider. Would it make everyone involved feel better if I simply signed up for P411? If that is what it takes I would do it, but when a provider wants to use a PI site as she stated she used it means she wants my info and that concerns me a little bit. While maybe I took too hard of a stand, I am just shocked someone would want to use a PI site.

I still maintain I would like to see different providers, and again I say if I have to have p411 to see you for example SG I would set it up.

She screened but you gave her no real info? Not fucking valid. I will never see you because i do not trust your references and I don't trust you.
guest010313 is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 02:33 PM   #51
KenMonk
Premium Access
 
KenMonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 4, 2011
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri
Posts: 3,289
Encounters: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SillyGirl View Post
She screened but you gave her no real info? Not fucking valid. I will never see you because i do not trust your references and I don't trust you.

lol well good for me I guess.
KenMonk is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 08:46 PM   #52
Bambi Kiss
Upgraded Female Account
 
User ID: 46248
Join Date: Sep 23, 2010
Location: Downtown/Stadium
My Bio Page
Posts: 114
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KenMonk View Post
You started this thread off with posting information about using a site that a PI would use. In order to effectively use a site such as this you need a certain amount of information. That screams paranoia to the extreme simply because you would need at least a full name and date of birth. That right there is enough to commit identify theft to say the least. That is my main concern and this was brought up in private so I am not the only one. I am simply the only one taking a stand on it.
I also stated yet again I want to be screened, but at what point is it too far? You said yourself you use a PI site then say that you only ask for one reference and an email addy? Which is it? If I wanted to see you tomorrow night would I have a chance, or would I need to give out a ton of information? You are sending mixed signals is all I am saying. Not to mention the track record as of late of the individuals you have associated yourself well is shady at best.
That is the perceived view of the hobbyist around here at least.


First of all my friend.... READ!!!
Now I apologize if I gave the wrong impression but I said
Not a danggon thing about Verif Him being a site that PI's use I said I have a totally different software
ok, totally different program I use that was given to me from a regular of mine
whom is a PI... get it right my friend.

And further more How do you know what
is needed to screen??? You dont ok and Im willing to
lay money down on it! Y O U DO NOT KNOW, becuz if
you did, you would know the form used on verify him..
Now as of having a leg to stand on discussing whom's name
I posted in the thread? You dont & that is completely irrelevant
and frankly IDGAF what you think ask anyone that knows
me well "SHE REALLY ISNT CONCERNED WITH WHAT YOU THINK OR SAY ABOUT HER!!!
And thats real.
Bambi Kiss is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 08:49 PM   #53
Bambi Kiss
Upgraded Female Account
 
User ID: 46248
Join Date: Sep 23, 2010
Location: Downtown/Stadium
My Bio Page
Posts: 114
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SillyGirl View Post
So there is some stand taking. Hmmm. Here is the issue Mr Monk. You won't give up personal info? Yet you went from newbie to having references. Which means your refs don't screen. So, for us paranoid ladies, you don't have any valid refs. You just put a lid on your options. I am super newbie friendly, because I do research. A lot of it. And maybe some people are dumb enough to fall for a fake receptionist but it is really pretty basic to check the business first. The amount of prep work involved in creating a fake business that will pass a check guarantees that it won't happen. And it is really silly to call verifyhim a PI tool. This has been around for a while, I'm guessing these girls don't hve PR access. I've looked at it and found it be of little value. But it isn't hard or expensive to dig up a birthdate either.

THANK YOU HUNNI...
Very valid point made
Bambi Kiss is offline   Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 06:19 PM   #54
GinaXXX
ECCIE Sponsor
 
GinaXXX's Avatar
 
User ID: 216
Join Date: Mar 29, 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 1,346
Default

Quote:
I was simply promoting this thread as instructed to by verify him
Seriously???? And you are actually doing it...

I hope that if I told anyone to go post promotion threads for P411, those people would tell me to go kiss their ass and light me up on the boards for shilling.

A good service doesn't need contrived (or purchased) accolades, the natural feedback will always speak for itself.

Sincerely,
Gina
GinaXXX is offline   Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 06:41 PM   #55
MsElena
Pending Age Verification
 
User ID: 3063
Join Date: Dec 27, 2009
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 6,988
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Gina,

I'll go promote P411 all over the board and others for points.
MsElena is offline   Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 07:11 PM   #56
old-tyme-racer
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: world
Posts: 1,461
Encounters: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MsElena View Post
Gina,

I'll go promote P411 all over the board and others for points.



Voice of reason
old-tyme-racer is offline   Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 08:18 PM   #57
Bambi Kiss
Upgraded Female Account
 
User ID: 46248
Join Date: Sep 23, 2010
Location: Downtown/Stadium
My Bio Page
Posts: 114
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GinaXXX View Post
Seriously???? And you are actually doing it...

I hope that if I told anyone to go post promotion threads for P411, those people would tell me to go kiss their ass and light me up on the boards for shilling.

A good service doesn't need contrived (or purchased) accolades, the natural feedback will always speak for itself.

Sincerely,
Gina
Yea seriously I did!!!

Last time I checked I could do WTF i wanted to do! 2 its one of 5 choices I
picked in exchange for free credits..
Im done explaining my self I have to get ready for work damn!
lol
Bambi Kiss is offline   Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 08:54 PM   #58
bartipero
Valued Poster
 
bartipero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 20, 2010
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,414
Default

Well, while we are all high fiving each other on the level of security we all generate I'll echo Dirty Dog's point, though I doubt the following points are unappreciated or unknown. The verification processes discussed here are a combination of risk reduction and probability you are really relying upon. Just because a service or internet servers are here or there in other countries, don't believe that you can't be tracked down or otherwise located by the government, or that they wouldn't do it, or that the number of customers or such things would in any way deter them. For one thing, doing so could easily be done by law enforcement technicians with little real effort beyond batch processing.

Gina's measures may be effective low tech to a certain extent, but it would in no way derail what I note. (Remember that friendly email reminder, and there is that pesky metadata that is never quite as gone as you like, especially on telephone/internet equipment?) Nor would being located in Canada--especially Canada--help you out. Cross border collaborations in the age of terrorism is now routine, and we have a myriad of relationships, not the least of which are by treaty, to obtain and coordinate all of that.

You may recall a few years ago how the U.S. captured and charged the owner of an international internet gambling business. Then there is extraordinary rendition. Manuel Noriega--no problem. There he sits in Federal prison in Florida. We have the Patriot Act, secret courts for approving secret search warrants, and dozens of other laws that have robbed us of our freedom and privacy while most if us sat by espousing platitudes about things where the ends justify the means.

Thank you, George Bush, and the cry babies of the world, but that us what we got for a sense of false security. And what you got--and get--is 'hand me your papers'. Sounds just a bit 'Sieg heil!' to me, and it is, but in the end what it means is the government can get you with routine effort if they want to, unless you are clear off the grid and never use the mail while being accurate and prompt in reporting your actual income and filing tax returns. A country with the ability at will to extend its forces throughout the world, to invade regionally powerful forces and dispose of them in mere days and hours, and which not even the Soviet Union could dispatch after 45 years of determined effort can sure find you if they want.
bartipero is offline   Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 09:23 PM   #59
Guest102513-1
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 24, 2010
Posts: 3,039
Default

Hey bartipero....can't really deny alot of what you say in your post. Without question our privacy is not even close to what it used to be.

But at the same time....despite all the powers-that-be, and despite the Noriegas (did he actually get release back to Panama recently?) and international gambling busts.

Let's keep our perspective in check. Hobblyland is what it is, it has it's risk.

But as long as "prohibited items" nor kid stuff involved US Fed intelligence has far bigger fish to fry.

Definitely not saying we play risk-free we don't. But let's not all get too parinod.

Again, I respect a lot (not all of it, lol) what you are saying...IMO, let's not get carried away.

Play smart, do research, stay with known solid ladies, cover your bases (like knowing a good criminal lawyer, now)...nothing is fail safe.
But neither is walking out your front door evey day.
Guest102513-1 is offline   Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 09:32 PM   #60
bartipero
Valued Poster
 
bartipero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 20, 2010
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,414
Default

Carried away can have various attributes, but make no mistake, they do not have bigger fish to fry, they just have different cooks for them....and a reason to cook. Phill Kline didn't become the Kansas attorney general and go after abortion clinics because they were big fish, nor did the Missouri legislature go after adult businesses as big fish. Sure, those are state examples, but doctrine in the end is the local prosecutor's choice even at the federal level, unless told otherwise--like by a bigger fish. The question becomes what clicks the lever of LE concentration on any particular day.
bartipero is offline   Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved