GET OVER IT!!!!

[biomed1]

I think Arklookn4luvn was asking about 2 points.

The First having to do with Providers feeling obligated to defend or refute a "not so glowing review".

The second and more important in my mind is this point:

Just how the hell are providers defending information contained in "The Rest of the Story" and not in the public portions of the review?

All of the comments have addressed the right to defend or dispute.

None of the comments have addressed the "provider defending information contained in "The Rest of the Story"".

Just my opinion.

Be Careful & Enjoy!

Biomed1

[Ginger Doll]

I don't think the ladies that addressed the info pertaining to the 30 minutes received versus 90 minutes paid-for were privy to the ROS, if that's what you're referring to. I personally became aware of it after several posters responded to the review thread, specifying the discrepancy between what was paid for, and what was actually received. And being it wasn't stated in the original poster's review, and only referred to in the review response posts...I'll just have to assume that's what you're talking about.

So, if you guys don't want us discussing it...then don't disclose the information in your review comments.

[MrGiz]

Originally Posted by Ginger Doll

. . . .
So, if you guys don't want us discussing it...then don't disclose the information in your review comments.

BRAVO !!
+1111111111111

[guest071811-3]

I get that its in the rules that you can "respond" to a review.. but come on now.. many of us have been around for awhile.. responding to UNTRUTHS in a review are one thing..those can and should be defended in a consise and intelligent manner..

however.. in recent rebuttals..they were not..they were long winded rants that objected the to guys OPINION.. a girl CAN'T object to a guys opinion..he is entitled to that.. if he thinks a girl was fatter or bigger or uglier or smellier or anything than he expected or anticipated..thats HIS THOUGHTS and no rebuttal should be allowed or is frankly even warranted..and while the rules allow it..the girl(s) should be smarter than that..

i get why some do it..it allows the white knights to come out in force..some don't have WK'S and it backfires and the result is less than desirable..

however..#1 pics posted of what i think may be a major reason for the post are usually heavily cropped, taken in a mirror with what appears to be a phone, with clothes on that are MORE than tight and will corral and keep in the "meat" that may be present or atleast the extra skin..hey Im a big girl..i get it.. however i never have ever ever tried to hide it.. any pics i post are not with weird angles or just shots with a certain outfit on that will keep me sucked in.. im big..got fat on me.. why hide it..the guys that show up will SEE IT.. why risk a bad review by not having accurate GOOD photos up.. i am not saying professional ones.. but ones that show different angles, ones that aren't in the same outfit..not ones taken in a mirror..not ones that get cropped.. no no..there is no hiding behind the ole faithful "i gotta conceal my identity"..no one is saying show your face.. but if someone wants to avoid bad reviews they better make damn sure they give an accurate indication of what a guy can expect..

In the end..this crap of girls popping up to defend one stinking less than flattering review would grow old.. it makes guys not wanna post reviews because the girls will just say thats not true and sadly some pussy whipped guy will come along to jump on the wk bandwagon to back her up.. thus the exchange of info lessens..which makes it harder on other hobbyiest and a nasty circle begins..

#1. if a provider has such stellar reviews and wants to live by them..then no rebuttal is needed since most hobbyiest can spot a quack review.. usually only providers struggling to make it are the ones that are quick to jump for fear of more business lost..

#2. if the best rebuttal to a review will be arguing the guys OPINION..just shut up while your ahead and go vent in the little girls rooms with the other pissed off miserable i hate my job but don't want the paying clients to know it GIRLS AREA.. thats what its for is to bitch in private.. you can't argue a guys opinion.. fine..argue facts.. if he didn't see you at all..then he lied..no review ..write a rebuttal.. if he didn't fuck you in the ass while you watched gone with the wind on tmc at 2 am while he sipped ine.. then fine.. write a rebuttal..

but for god sakes.. if he thinks your fat, ugly, live in a shitty place, wasn't into it, didn't meet something he was led to believe would be met..then you can't argue that.. its his opinion..

it is a growing trend that many don't care to see.. the true professionals know its a big no no.. the true professionals no that if your on your game..there is nothing to worry about.. and that 1 bad review if a fake..will be spotted

just handle your business. be professional and cover your ends.. bring your best every time and do all you can.. if he still writes a bad review.. oh well..

[Guest032112]

Originally Posted by DeAnna Luv

I get that its in the rules that you can "respond" to a review.. but come on now.. many of us have been around for awhile.. responding to UNTRUTHS in a review are one thing..those can and should be defended in a consise and intelligent manner..

however.. in recent rebuttals..they were not..they were long winded rants that objected the to guys OPINION.. a girl CAN'T object to a guys opinion..he is entitled to that.. if he thinks a girl was fatter or bigger or uglier or smellier or anything than he expected or anticipated..thats HIS THOUGHTS and no rebuttal should be allowed or is frankly even warranted..and while the rules allow it..the girl(s) should be smarter than that..l..

'nuf said! And my only other comment was what I started out with. "GET OVER IT!!!!"

[urhuckleberry]

Per OP request, closing thread.

Huck