Quote:
Originally Posted by Mental AtrraXXXion
There is NO use to try and advise others to move differently when it comes to reviewing encounters. All you get push back and BS excuses why they should be able to continue without caution. I have come to the consensus that they don't give a damn, they only think about themselves and that they feel when one shop closes another will open. Not caring about the damage that is done or people that are affected. Truly selfishness and a disregard. Narcissistic Bullshit and self exaltation.
|
There is a thread on the main page devoted to this topic:
https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...post1063894684
Rather than rail against those who can’t get their PA credit from overseas visits, provide your perspective in that forum and maybe ownership will see it and respond. Biomed, who is no mere mod, at least spoke up and explained where the decisions are made regarding what is considered sufficient for a credit-worthy review.
If those rules were ever changed for studios and AMPs, you’d get a lot of guys applying peer pressure to those who don’t fall in line since the one legitimate excuse for full disclosure would be taken away.
I am not saying ownership is likely to create a different standard for AMP reviews, but miracles do happen on occasion so I encourage everyone who wants to see change speak up in that thread.