Epstein, an albatross around Trump's neck

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by oldman2525

lads and lasses? GOD, study your allies son, those terms arent used in widsor, which is in the south england. lads and lasses
are mainly scotland and the upper northern regions of england

This is an awfully funny thing to get worked up about.


Anything to distract from the fact that Dear Leader's name is littered all throughout the Epstein files.

[HDGristle]

It really does look like Trump's signature on that birthday book page is legit

[Iceman]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Kash Patel was recently grilled by congress and told the congressmen that no one else was implicated in the Epstein FBI files.

If that’s the case then why was Ghislaine Maxwell convicted for child sex trafficking?

And then why won’t they release the files?


https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...-patel-claims/
Epstein Files Don’t Implicate Others In Trafficking Scheme, FBI Chief Patel Claims

The FBI’s files on Jeffrey Epstein do not implicate any of his high-profile friends in the late financier’s sex trafficking scheme, FBI Director Kash Patel—under particular scrutiny after the agency’s investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk—claimed Tuesday, sparking criticism from Democrats as the Trump administration continues to face scrutiny over its handling of the Epstein files.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., questioned Patel during a hearing Tuesday about his knowledge of the Epstein files, asking if the documents showed who else Epstein—who was indicted on sex trafficking charges before dying in prison in 2019—trafficked young women to.

Patel said he reviewed a “good amount” of the agency’s total Epstein files, though not all of them, and there is “no credible information” Epstein “trafficked to other individuals.”

“If there were I would bring the case yesterday,” Patel claimed, though he went on to say the information the FBI has is “limited” and the fact the FBI files don’t implicate any Epstein associates doesn’t mean “others were not involved.”

Patel defended the FBI’s decision not to release its full files on Epstein during his testimony Tuesday, claiming the agency was hamstrung by court rulings and alleging the agency is acting “transparently” by complying with a House subpoena for the full Epstein files.

Click the link to read the full article.

Is it possible that she only procured for Epstein?

Not saying this is true but a possibility.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Iceman

Is it possible that she only procured for Epstein?

Not saying this is true but a possibility.

It’s a possibility I suppose but Kash Patel is a perjurer in my opinion. He testified before congress that he had not had any discussions about the Epstein files with the president. I don’t buy that for an instant.

It’s still a good idea to release all the information they have collected in my opinion.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Iceman

Is it possible that she only procured for Epstein?

Not saying this is true but a possibility.

it's quite possible. problem is the left can't accept the possibility that the truth is .. Maxwell was nothing more than a high end madam and Epstein a john and all these sluts were noting more than paid whores.

because that's what they were. paid whores.

people need to stop crying about paid whores being paid whores. everyone on this site is guilty of the same thing as Epstein. paying for pussy.

[onawbtngr546]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

it's quite possible. problem is the left can't accept the possibility that the truth is .. Maxwell was nothing more than a high end madam and Epstein a john and all these sluts were noting more than paid whores.

because that's what they were. paid whores.

people need to stop crying about paid whores being paid whores. everyone on this site is guilty of the same thing as Epstein. paying for pussy.

Conveniently omitting the fact that they were children. How can you have a paid whore who's a child?