As they should lose their jobs and be blacklisted from ever be hired anywhere, not even to dig a ditch or clean toilets

[1blackman1]

Actually the standard is deep held beliefs. The court decided that the religious belief was exactly that. I’d prefer not to provide service to a Klansman. Hence, I’ll refuse to do so, unless you believe I shouldn’t have that option. If I shouldn’t have that option, no one should, right?

[RX792P]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

did Trump say that? or do you need to believe he did?





who's butthurt? the ones who liked the hate speech or the idiots who posted it and got fired?



they can be butthurt all they want but if they spew hate speech on the interwebs glorifying Kirk's killing they will be fired.



Should the Ghouls Publicly Celebrating Charlie Kirk's Assassination Lose Their Jobs?

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...urder-n2663316


In the aftermath of the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a violently deranged and hate-filled leftist (yes, that is a confirmed fact), some on the hard Left have been publicly expressing justifications for, and even celebrations of, the murder. These ghouls do not represent America, nor do they represent America's center-left coalition writ large. Many politicians, public figures and private citizens on the 'progressive' end of the spectrum have prominently and unequivocally denounced the killing. This must be acknowledged and embraced with gratitude by all people of good will. The forces of decency must stand together against the cancer of political violence and twisted vigilantism. What must also be said is that there is a toxic and not-insignificant strain of leftism that indulges, excuses, and cheers on this evil. We saw it after the cold-blooded murder of healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City. We've seen it repeatedly from the pro-Hamas hate mob for nearly two straight years. And we're seeing it again in the wake of Kirk's violent demise. Applauding murder is vile and should have no place in a civilized, free society. This should not be controversial.

did Trump say that?

Well yes he did.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/president...al-censorship/

RESTORING FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ENDING FEDERAL CENSORSHIP
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:


Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to: (a) secure the right of the American people to engage in constitutionally protected speech;

(b) ensure that no Federal Government officer, employee, or agent engages in or facilitates any conduct that would unconstitutionally abridge the free speech of any American citizen;

(c) ensure that no taxpayer resources are used to engage in or facilitate any conduct that would unconstitutionally abridge the free speech of any American citizen; and

(d) identify and take appropriate action to correct past misconduct by the Federal Government related to censorship of protected speech.

Sec. 3. Ending Censorship of Protected Speech. (a) No Federal department, agency, entity, officer, employee, or agent may act or use any Federal resources in a manner contrary to section 2 of this order.

[RX792P]

House Speaker Mike Johnson

“Leaders cannot call their political opponents ‘Nazis’ and ‘fascists’ and ‘enemies of the state’ because they disagree with their policy priorities. I mean, this is something we should have learned in grade school,” “This type of language spurs on depraved people, deranged people, who take that as a cue and this tragic phenomenon played out this week in Utah.”

President Donald Trump

I would like to wish everyone, including all haters and losers (of which, sadly, there are many) a truly happy and enjoyable Memorial Day!

“We’re dealing with a radical left group of lunatics, and they don’t play fair and they never did.”

“She’s a fascist, OK? She’s a fascist.”

“running a Gestapo administration”

“We have radical left lunatics out there and we just have to beat the hell out of them.”

"Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. Let's see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face."

[Jacuzzme]

Trump is a god level troll.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Trump is a god level troll.

Not exactly a rousing endorsement for public service.

[Jacuzzme]

Maybe not, but it’s entertaining AF.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Trump is a god level troll.

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Not exactly a rousing endorsement for public service.

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Maybe not, but it’s entertaining AF.

This is just sad.

[Stockinglover]

You would think that everyday people would watch what they are saying. We are seeing more and more people getting fired. Dumb fucks need to remove their comments before they feel the wrath of their employers

[texassapper]

Originally Posted by Stockinglover

You would think that everyday people would watch what they are saying. We are seeing more and more people getting fired. Dumb fucks need to remove their comments before they feel the wrath of their employers

Everyday people do. What you are seeing are the people who have heretofore been insulated from consequences for their speech because they are on the left. Turns out that the Right is better at cancel culture than the folks that invented it. And when the civil conflict arises to the level of violence (like assassination) the Right will be better at that too.

Ite been said that the left has a dial for violence.. the turn it up slowly. First its random assaults (the knockout game(. Then it becomes more organized (beatings at public events - See Portland, OR), then outright destruction (BLM, pANTIFAg). The Right doesn't have a dial..they have a switch. its on or off.... prior to Kirks assassination the Rights cancel culture switch was off. now we've racked up 50K+ firings in a week.

Pray we don't ever hit their violence switch... because it will mean the end of the Left.

[biomed1]

The following is not permitted on the site:

Insulting Others
Targeting other members for attacks
Harassing other members, groups of members, class of members, etc
Disrespecting other members on the site
General rudeness toward other members on the site
Threats of Violence

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... THAT - is WRONG on two fronts!

... First, Pam Bondi is correct on this - and, no, she was NOT
implying it's a possible "hate crime" as much as it's a
possible violation of the law... Refusing to print the
posters because the printer didn't fancy the message.

... Second, the bakery case is different altogether.
The bakery surely claimed "Religious Exemption"...

... You must have missed that. ...

#### Salty

Nope. And see below. She is saying hate speech or something like that. No law against it. *BUT* if you can show something already on the books, we're waiting

And i ain't gonna touch religion since the combining of that and politics has really heated the shit to stinking of late.

Originally Posted by RX792P

Well yes he did.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/president...al-censorship/

RESTORING FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ENDING FEDERAL CENSORSHIP
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:


Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to: (a) secure the right of the American people to engage in constitutionally protected speech;

(b) ensure that no Federal Government officer, employee, or agent engages in or facilitates any conduct that would unconstitutionally abridge the free speech of any American citizen;

(c) ensure that no taxpayer resources are used to engage in or facilitate any conduct that would unconstitutionally abridge the free speech of any American citizen; and

(d) identify and take appropriate action to correct past misconduct by the Federal Government related to censorship of protected speech.

Sec. 3. Ending Censorship of Protected Speech. (a) No Federal department, agency, entity, officer, employee, or agent may act or use any Federal resources in a manner contrary to section 2 of this order.

This is called doing the legwork.

Take note maggies.