Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

BobbyC50 · 09-07-2021, 08:08 PM

I’ve had two encounters declined in the last week. One said that I’d already reviewed that provider within the last few months and the other said no activity took place, Amyone getting this crap? I’m about to say bye bye folks,

bashar · 09-07-2021, 11:23 PM

My last review was declined due to no activity. I tried to keep the review on a subAMP vague considering the new hobby environment. I was told I can be open in the ROS.

Billogoods · 09-08-2021, 08:13 AM

IMO, a review about getting denied services is worth as much, or more, than one about another rub-n-tug. Saves me money.

packeye · 09-08-2021, 08:52 AM

I had a review denied because the contact information wasn't right or complete. It was for a strip club too. Like the Dallas scene, this website I am sure has seen a large decline in activity.

Wile E Coyote · 09-08-2021, 09:33 AM

IMO, A review should be only of providers who advertise online, so you can provide the link(s) of where you found them and their contact info. Reason being, if they advertise, especially on a review board and/or are members of such a board, then they know what they are in for when being reviewed.

Providers who do not advertise (strip club dancers, AMPs, ect.) really should not be reviewed if you had a good time. Yes, I know you want to get your 6 weeks of PA, but doing so will not only get LE eyes wider on AMPs as they do not screen clients and accept walk-ins, making them easy targets for stings and one of the reasons why the AMP scene is gone in Dallas, but also, strippers are YMMV and do not do the same service (even though they get paid the same $20/song) for all customers. Plus, once a stripper gets word of a review you posted, usually from the schmucks who read it and demand the same service, your days of getting extras at least from that dancer, if not all the dancers that do extras at that club, are gone.

As far as "no" recommendation reviews go, do them or at least provide intel in the back channels. When a provider does not provide advertised services or worse yet, she robs you, there is a pimp in the bathroom shower, ect. then it is your duty as a member of a SHMB to give the details of that encounter. It does not matter if she advertises or not, the hobbyist brethren need to know who to avoid for one reason or another.

To the OP, I believe there is a time separation there has to be when reviewing the same provider, it may be 4 months, but you might want to ask a mod. When you see a provider and no activity took place (she NCNSed, she had you wait for too long in the parking lot so you left without seeing her, if you are too vague with or give no BCD activities in the ROS ect.), you can still give intel on your experience with that provider, but it is not a review because per your own words, you never saw her for a BCD session.

AP51 · 09-08-2021, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyC50

I’ve had two encounters declined in the last week. One said that I’d already reviewed that provider within the last few months and the other said no activity took place, Amyone getting this crap? I’m about to say bye bye folks,

I have had reviews denied because it had not been 3 months since I reviewed her. I have also had reviews denied because there were no activities trying to be discreet. Saying put it in the ROS is BS. If you believe LE doesn't have access to the ROS then I have some ocean front property I'd like to sell you in Las Vegas.

BobbyC50 · 09-08-2021, 10:01 AM

I’m not planning to be any more explicit in my reviews. If that’s going to be the requirement then I will simply stop reviewing. I will not agree to put any explicit activity in my public headings, I only say FSBM (See ROS) and leave my comments for others who get access. I also agree that no activity is just as important.

We’ll have to see where these rulings takes this forum in the future.

Wile E Coyote · 09-08-2021, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AP51

I have had reviews denied because it had not been 3 months since I reviewed her. I have also had reviews denied because there were no activities trying to be discreet. Saying put it in the ROS is BS. If you believe LE doesn't have access to the ROS then I have some ocean front property I'd like to sell you in Las Vegas.

That is one of the major flaws of this site. Anyone with an internet connection can sign up for an account for free, and if you do not have it, any public place like McDonald's or Starbucks will get you the access to create an account and freely post as well. Then, to get PA, all you have to do is write a review (real or not) or just pay for access, which is great for trolls and of course, LE. You do not have to be a real hobbyist or have any references to gain that PA privilege on Eccie.

twitch760 · 09-08-2021, 10:46 AM

The board for Texas needs to have its rules adjusted to fit the environment here. PA needs to go away in all forms and strict rules about what can be posted put in place. I get it this board was built on the idea to share information openly but we just can't do that here in Texas. We're all risking some serious prison time now even posting here if they can get a girl to flip on her Johns.

bashar · 09-08-2021, 01:48 PM

Apparently writing “on the flip the massage was even more relaxing because of her technique” is too vague and amounts to no activity.

BobbyC50 · 09-08-2021, 06:53 PM

I get that the short crappy reviews don’t get credit. They’re a waste of time to even look at them.

SpelunkMeister · 09-09-2021, 02:21 PM

Yep 2 were declined because I didn’t get their names. Never had this happen before and I have not gotten names in the past, so apparently there’s a resurgence of rule adherence. If the reviews arn’t recommending that you visit, then what difference does it make?