https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/elect...W3m?li=BBnb7Kz
For centuries, South Carolina's Charleston was the largest port of  entry for the transatlantic slave trade. Now, a billionaire activist  named Tom Steyer is shaking up the state's Democratic primary by  advocating slavery reparations for African Americans.
   
 A California financier turned philanthropist and environmental  campaigner, Steyer has poured tens of millions of dollars into the state  ahead of Saturday's vote -- with a single-minded focus on the black  voters who make up 60 percent of its Democratic electorate.
How  South Carolina's African Americans vote in the White House primaries is  traditionally a key indicator of which contender has nationwide support  from the black community -- a crucial Democratic constituency.
Flooding  the airwaves with promises to compensate the descendants of slaves, and  to invest in universities in historically marginalized black  communities, Steyer -- who lags far behind his Democratic rivals  nationally -- has hoisted himself into third place in state polls,  behind Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders.
"You've got to tell the truth  about what happened," Steyer said during one of his final campaign  stops at a Mexican restaurant in Myrtle Beach, drawing applause from the  diverse crowd.
"You've got to repair what's done so that we can  move on together," said Steyer, who says the United States needs to  confront a "subtext of race" underpinning nearly every issue it faces,  more than 150 years after the abolition of slavery in 1865.
Teresa Skinner, an African-American retired nurse and veteran, was impressed.
"Tom  Steyer's bringing something new," said the 51-year-old. "It's just an  enlightening thing. He's just coming in as an individual that's wanting  to make us better than what we are, and right now we're in a divided  nation." 
'Aggressive stance'
Robert  Greene, a visiting professor at Claflin University, a historically black  college in South Carolina, attributes Steyer's popularity squarely to  his "very aggressive stance" on reparations, "an issue that most of the  other candidates will not touch." 
The idea of reparations has  been the topic of contentious debate in the United States for decades,  but has picked up steam in recent years. 
Last April, students at  Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., voted to create a fund to  compensate the descendants of 272 people enslaved at the Jesuit-run  school who in 1838 were sold to finance its operations. 
In the past two years, at least two other US institutions have set up funds intended to address their past links with slavery.
In a video released this week, Steyer's campaign stated its case in uncompromising terms. 
"For  400 years, this country has built a racist system of profits made on  the backs of incarcerated black bodies," a narrator says. "Reparations  are well overdue."
Retiree Ama Saran -- who intends to vote for  Biden -- recognizes the potential of Steyer's proposal, but has doubts  over what it would mean in practice. 
"I think that it is  important. I think it needs to be looked at," said Saran, who is African  American. "But we would have to plan that thing because there's a lot  of division among the people who would be afforded reparations. There is  not that much agreement about what that means."
Other Democratic  candidates have agreed to convene a commission to study reparations if  they win, but only Steyer has made the issue a cornerstone of his  campaign. 
Money or message?
President Donald Trump aimed an election-eve jab at Steyer, branding him a "loser" and a "joke."
But  as Steyer pumps money into South Carolina, he has faced bitter  criticism from Democratic rivals too, who accuse both him and fellow  billionaire Michael Bloomberg of using virtually unlimited resources to  buy the election. 
"What's happening is you have Steyer spending  hundreds of millions," Biden complained last weekend, when asked why his  lead in the state had narrowed.
Biden is banking heavily on the  black vote in South Carolina and beyond, hoping to leverage his  popularity as Barack Obama's former vice president in a race that no  longer features any African-American candidates.
Steyer's actual  ad expenditure in South Carolina stood at $23.6 million as of February  27, according to the Advertising Analytics monitor -- almost 10 times  the second spender, the centrist Pete Buttigieg.
Steyer denies his  growing support comes down to money: His campaign makes the case that  as a newcomer to politics he had to invest to make himself known to the  public. 
"When you say that he's buying an election, you're  actually insulting the voters," Steyer's spokesman Alberto Lammers told  AFP at the campaign's headquarters in Charleston. 
"What is resonating is his message, and people are responding to that."
The Fascist DPST's are on a CAPITALIST Roll!!!!  Steyer and bloomie are out buying the election - yet the communist bolshevik Bernie still runs in front. 
Shameless vote buying pandering the DPST's are learning their lesson from Al Sharpton - all of the candidates now have pledged to support "slavery reparations".  
Hope the DPST's posters here love their taxes raised to re-allocate more wealth - 
shameless Pandering!!!
J666 will love it  - maybe he/she will get paid too. !