Trump's First Year: An Amazing Success

[Austin Ellen]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I would tend to agree with you on this one. The Kennedy name?

That one confuses me too. It's like they want some young,upcoming person to inspire their base. But with a name that is from the 1960's. They missed - big time.

[Austin Dude]

Originally Posted by Groovy Johnson

Notice not a syllable about Kennedy's truth,logic,or sense.
No challenge. No debate.
Just skin color and saliva.
When challenged by facts,they try to distract.

It's funny. Their comments. "How dare you pick a young, drooling white man whose name is synonymous with wealth. You should pick an old, orange man whose name is synonymous with wealth. And if you do it right, like them, he will be a racist, sexual predator who cheats on his wife."

The nerve to tell the Democrats they should have put up a minority, when their minorities routinely tell them that their party doesn't have their best interests and overwhelmingly vote Democratic. I don't think the Democrats are the ones out of touch. That's why younger voters and minorities are all lining up with the Democratic Party and the Republicans keep playing to the racists.

[Austin Dude]

Hey here's a little fun for the next time a Trump follower brags about the great tax cut:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/31/u...=headline&te=1

This is what happens when you give the top 1% the majority of a tax cut. They pay even less and then the middle class pays a little less and the budget gets destroyed. You would think a man whose companies have gone bankrupt as much as Trump would know these things.

[Austin Ellen]

The other crazy thing is that their optics are totally not what they are saying. They say Rebulicans don't have enough minorities - well, here was their chance to reach voters and to show a minority voice and what minorities need and want -
and they pick this kid who I swear - looked like he was going to cry at any moment. Optics,optics,optics. And his speech was a speech- that's it. Oh well, there's always Nancy if they want to win over the white women vote

[Austin Dude]

Minorities: "Republicans don't have our interests at heart." Goes on to vote overwhelmingly Democratic in elections.

Republicans: "The Democrats picked a white man to give a rebuttal to our racist, who minorities hate. They are so out of touch with minorities."

Minorities: "We don't care that a "drooling white man" gave one of the speeches, that doesn't matter to us. We care that Trump is bad for us."

Republicans: "The Dems are so tone deaf, they missed the opportunity to reach minority voters and give their needs a light."

Minorities: "We are voting Democratic in elections, they don't need to reach us. And we tell y'all our needs and protest to show them and your racist president attacks us. Also where are y'alls minority leaders?"

Republicans: "Boy those Democrats sure missed a golden opportunity."

Minorities: "Oh ok, we get it. You don't care about us really. You just want to make it seem like the people we have seen fighting for us also don't care. You still think we are dumb. Ok keep acting like y'all don't attack Kamala Harris and Cory Booker (the abusive ex) all the time. Democratic leaders in the Senate. And keep pretending y'all have any pull with minority communities."

[Hugh Shcrapps]

"minorities" need to grow up and stop asking for handouts. Perhaps they would be better off in another country where they can Rob, rape and kill as they please without mean ole whitey and his laws.

[Groovy Johnson]

Latinos USED to vote republican.
What changed that?

[Hugh Shcrapps]

Originally Posted by Groovy Johnson

Latinos USED to vote republican.
What changed that?

Democrats gave them free money, coddled them, made excuses for them. A lot of them are hoping the Democrats will make crime legal.

[gfejunkie]

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploa...use_letter.pdf

I feel vindicated. I know the President does too.

A new special council will be ordered up shortly, I'm sure.

It's only beginning.

[assfucker]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploa...use_letter.pdf

I feel vindicated. I know the President does too.

A new special council will be ordered up shortly, I'm sure.

It's only beginning.

You're a fucking idiot. Even Trump's own fbi head has said that letter is full of factual errors. What will it take for you Trumptard simpletons to admit you've been conned?

[Austin Dude]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploa...use_letter.pdf

I feel vindicated. I know the President does too.

A new special council will be ordered up shortly, I'm sure.

It's only beginning.

You feel vindicated? Why? It's a partisan memo that does what it was intend. To try to give Trump a reason to stop the Mueller investigation. Yet in the memo it states that the investigation was started because of Papadopoulos. So they were already investigating.

The FBI got the warrant renewed three times which means they had to prove that they were getting valuable intelligence.

The memo contradicts itself when it admits that some of the dossier was corroborated.

Also Wray and Rosenstein both said it wasn't giving the full picture since it cherry picked what was put in it. A

Nunes admitted he didn't read any of the classified info. He also wouldn't deny he worked with people in the White House on it.

And there will be a Democratic Memo that gives another side to the story.

A new special council? I would assume you mean a parallel one to "investigate the FBI?" Because nothing in the memo can gives a need to get rid of Mueller. The only reason Trump wants to get rid of him is that he is getting too close.

But Trump can't fire Mueller outright. That would be another example of obstruction. He would have to fire Rosenstein (someone he appointed) and then have the new deputy AG fire Mueller. That would give even more proof of obstruction.

So Trump buys himself a few months. And what happens when the House flips? They either hold open hearings and have Mueller, Rosenstein, Comey, McCabe, and others working on the council testify to what they found and their thoughts on Trump's obstruction. Or they bring Mueller on as an independent council. That would take it out of Trump's hands. Trust his lawyers are telling him that firing Rosenstein to get rid of Mueller opens him up to more than he can handle. But Trump is a moron so he could work himself into more trouble.

This is definitely only the beginning of the fall of a president.

[Hugh Shcrapps]

Originally Posted by Austin Dude

You feel vindicated? Why? It's a partisan memo that does what it was intend. To try to give Trump a reason to stop the Mueller investigation. Yet in the memo it states that the investigation was started because of Papadopoulos. So they were already investigating.

The FBI got the warrant renewed three times which means they had to prove that they were getting valuable intelligence.

The memo contradicts itself when it admits that some of the dossier was corroborated.

Also Wray and Rosenstein both said it wasn't giving the full picture since it cherry picked what was put in it. A

Nunes admitted he didn't read any of the classified info. He also wouldn't deny he worked with people in the White House on it.

And there will be a Democratic Memo that gives another side to the story.

A new special council? I would assume you mean a parallel one to "investigate the FBI?" Because nothing in the memo can gives a need to get rid of Mueller. The only reason Trump wants to get rid of him is that he is getting too close.

But Trump can't fire Mueller outright. That would be another example of obstruction. He would have to fire Rosenstein (someone he appointed) and then have the new deputy AG fire Mueller. That would give even more proof of obstruction.

So Trump buys himself a few months. And what happens when the House flips? They either hold open hearings and have Mueller, Rosenstein, Comey, McCabe, and others working on the council testify to what they found and their thoughts on Trump's obstruction. Or they bring Mueller on as an independent council. That would take it out of Trump's hands. Trust his lawyers are telling him that firing Rosenstein to get rid of Mueller opens him up to more than he can handle. But Trump is a moron so he could work himself into more trouble.

This is definitely only the beginning of the fall of a president.

You, and the media has been promising us that trump would fall for quite some time.

After the media lies to you over and over again you still believe them. Sad.

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by Hugh Shcrapps

Democrats gave them free money, coddled them, made excuses for them. A lot of them are hoping the Democrats will make crime legal.

I think we have a bigot in the crowd.

[assfucker]

Originally Posted by Hugh Shcrapps

You, and the media has been promising us that trump would fall for quite some time.

After the media lies to you over and over again you still believe them. Sad.

Same could be said about Trumptard snowflakes.

I don't watch MSM and I think the Orange One will fall bigly soon. Not everyone is a brainless monkey in a false dichotomy.

[Austin Dude]

Originally Posted by Hugh Shcrapps

You, and the media has been promising us that trump would fall for quite some time.

After the media lies to you over and over again you still believe them. Sad.

After Trump lies to you over and over again you still believe him. Sad.