What constitutes "boots on the ground"?

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I would sleep better if you had ended up in a condom.

You have no problem sleeping every night since Big Sir packs your fudge and gives you ATM before tucking you in at your Momma SEEster's house.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

While I fully respect your OPINION (not) how about bringing some unbiased opinions into the discussion...

So how about educating yourself just a little so you are not just giving us your rather ignorant opinion.

Rating Presidents past and present is a highly subjective task and one that invites bias. Your spot-on evaluation will inevitably be deemed a "rather ignorant opinion" by someone else.

And the bias can't be overcome with facts. Try reciting the facts of Reagan's economic record to WTFagboy. Or try to get bigkotex to talk about how popular GWB is today instead of constantly dragging out a 7 year-old poll and thinking he is making a point.
.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Rating Presidents past and present is a highly subjective task and one that invites bias. Your spot-on evaluation will inevitably be deemed a "rather ignorant opinion" by someone else.

And the bias can't be overcome with facts. Try reciting the facts of Reagan's economic record to WTFagboy. Or try to get bigkotex to talk about how popular GWB is today instead of constantly dragging out a 7 year-old poll and thinking he is making a point.
.

What world do you live in where GWB was ever popular?

Reagan's economic record.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

You have no problem sleeping every night since Big Sir packs your fudge and gives you ATM before tucking you in at your Momma SEEster's house.

What in the name of Zeus' butthole does that have to do with you ending up in a condom? We already know the best part of you ran down the crack of your momma's ass and ended up on the floor of a Denny's restroom

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Rating Presidents past and present is a highly subjective task and one that invites bias. Your spot-on evaluation will inevitably be deemed a "rather ignorant opinion" by someone else.

And the bias can't be overcome with facts. Try reciting the facts of Reagan's economic record to WTFagboy. Or try to get bigkotex to talk about how popular GWB is today instead of constantly dragging out a 7 year-old poll and thinking he is making a point.
.

I don't disagree with your first paragraph. However, some people are considered more "expert" in such matters than others. What you can get is some consensus when the same names keep showing up on top and the same names keep showing up on the bottom. Let's just say I take the opinions of those cited over Rey Lengua any day of the week.

And the bias on this forum exists on both sides of the aisle.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

And the bias can't be overcome with facts. Try reciting the facts of Reagan's economic record to WTFagboy. .
.

Reagan is overrated and Carter underrated. If your Jim Jones like worship of Ronnie would fall into even ten minutes of objectivity, you'd read the link below and actually learn wtf cycle's are and like surfers, you not only know how to ride a wave but there has to be one. Had Carter been reelected , we would have had much the same results.


http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-carterreagan.htm

Summary

Carter cannot be blamed for the double-digit inflation that peaked on his watch, because inflation started growing in 1965 and snowballed for the next 15 years. To battle inflation, Carter appointed Paul Volcker as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, who defeated it by putting the nation through an intentional recession. Once the threat of inflation abated in late 1982, Volcker cut interest rates and flooded the economy with money, fueling an expansion that lasted seven years. Neither Carter nor Reagan had much to do with the economic events that occurred during their terms

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

" He's not a supporter of terrorist ". How naïve YOU are, ya cum guzzler ! HE WAS THE KEYNOTE SPEAKER AT THE HAMAS " CONVENTION " LAST YEAR HERE IN THE U.S. !!!! Back to the 'holes with your lying ass !

Again you lie. He spoke at the Islamic Society of North America convention. I know to idiots like you, all muslims are the same, but try and keep up, you dirty-rotten dingleberry farmer.

Back to the dingleberry fields with YOUR lying ass!!!!!!

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

From Wikipedia:

"Hamas is designated as a terrorist organization by the European Union, Canada, Israel, Egypt, Japan and the United States."

SCHOOLED AGAIN, SEWER RAT!!!

THE POSTER YOU CALL "THE MOST STUPID MOTHERFUCKER ON HERE" AND "AS STUPID AS THE DAY IS LONG " JUST HANDED YOUR GRUBERED, LIBTARDED FAGGOT ASS TO YOU!!!

.

Except it wasn't a Hamas convention, you goddamn retard. You and gay rey belong together. A blind hog finding an acorn doesn't mean the hog isn't blind, btw.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I don't disagree with your first paragraph. However, some people are considered more "expert" in such matters than others. What you can get is some consensus when the same names keep showing up on top and the same names keep showing up on the bottom. Let's just say I take the opinions of those cited over Rey Lengua any day of the week.

And the bias on this forum exists on both sides of the aisle.

As any sane person would.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Again you lie. He spoke at the Islamic Society of North America convention.

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Except it wasn't a Hamas convention, you goddamn retard.

Did you say ISNA? Aren't they the nice folks who were named by the US Justice Department as unindicted co-conspirators for trying to launder and funnel millions of dollars to Hamas? Damn, how could Rey possibly have conflated the two?!?

By the way, sewer rat, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz agrees with Rey's characterization of Jimmy Carter's actions. Is Dershowitz lying too?

"Jimmy Carter has now become an all-out cheerleader for Hamas," Dershowitz said.... "it's against the law to provide material support to a listed terrorist organization and Jimmy Carter's coming awfully close to that line."

.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

What world do you live in where GWB was ever popular?

Bush was already more popular than Odumbo last Summer, you fucking amnesiac. We talked about it in more than one thread.

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1402049

What world do you live in where you can't even remember what you posted a few months ago? You are, by far, the stupidest motherfucker on eccie.

.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Did you say ISNA? Aren't they the nice folks who were named by the US Justice Department as unindicted co-conspirators for trying to launder and funnel millions of dollars to Hamas? Damn, how could Rey possibly have conflated the two?!?

By the way, sewer rat, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz agrees with Rey's characterization of Jimmy Carter's actions. Is Dershowitz lying too?

"Jimmy Carter has now become an all-out cheerleader for Hamas," Dershowitz said.... "it's against the law to provide material support to a listed terrorist organization and Jimmy Carter's coming awfully close to that line."

.

You'll notice he stops short of what you claim, because he's got half a brain, unlike yourself. Your ilk are known for carpet bombing, lacking any real precision, so let's discuss, shall we? Hamas has a military wing, which the UK labels a terrorist organization. China, Norway, Switzerland, Russia, Brazil and Turkey do not label Hamas itself as a terrorist organization.

I know you and gay rey don't understand nuance, but it's not as simple as labeling them a terrorist organization and being done with it. I know it is for dumbasses like you, but for those of us with any critical thinking skills, it's more than that.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Bush was already more popular than Odumbo last Summer, you fucking amnesiac. We talked about it in more than one thread.

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1402049

What world do you live in where you can't even remember what you posted a few months ago? You are, by far, the stupidest motherfucker on eccie.

.

We weren't talking about more popular than Obama, shitstain. Nice deflection.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Rating Presidents past and present is a highly subjective task and one that invites bias. Your spot-on evaluation will inevitably be deemed a "rather ignorant opinion" by someone else.

And the bias can't be overcome with facts. Try reciting the facts of Reagan's economic record to WTFagboy. Or try to get bigkotex to talk about how popular GWB is today instead of constantly dragging out a 7 year-old poll and thinking he is making a point.
.

Originally Posted by WombRaider

We weren't talking about more popular than Obama, shitstain. Nice deflection.

Nowhere, is Obama mentioned. Keep trying, turdface, you'll get it one day.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

You'll notice he stops short of what you claim, because he's got half a brain, unlike yourself. Your ilk are known for carpet bombing, lacking any real precision, so let's discuss, shall we? Hamas has a military wing, which the UK labels a terrorist organization. China, Norway, Switzerland, Russia, Brazil and Turkey do not label Hamas itself as a terrorist organization.

I know you and gay rey don't understand nuance, but it's not as simple as labeling them a terrorist organization and being done with it. I know it is for dumbasses like you, but for those of us with any critical thinking skills, it's more than that.

So you're saying Odumbo's State Department and the EU don't "understand nuance"? And both of them lack "any critical thinking skills" when it comes to labeling terrorist organizations? Is that your point, sewer rat? Then why don't you explain to THEM that Hamas and its military wing should be viewed as separate entities? You're good at hair-splitting, sewer rat. After all, you studied at the feet of the Weasel-in-Chief himself when he famously proclaimed "that depends on what the definition of 'is' is..."

.