To Whom It May Concern

[~DolceVitaBentley~]

References are not what I am going off of these days!I need way more then 3 references!My requirements that are in place are for me to know and only me to know I'm not publishing any more info on this!To bad for me if you are legit! My real life is way more loss if I keep dealing with someone that has not the simple things I require!The screening does not stop with me.Better luck with someone else!And please don't contact me unless your ready to give out personal confidential info. No pun intended just letting it be known!

[KCQuestor]

Oooooookay

[The DarkSide]

hmmm i could have sworn that bree commented on this thread and now its gone? I agree with KC and expressing the same sentiment OOOOOOOOKKAAAYYY yikes!

[LongStick]

Cool. dont know why she just didn't update her showcase to reflect her screening requirements. idk maybe she did I just didn't see it I was too interested in the pic of the black jacket And BOOBS cool on the getting a BS thing. Ever hear the mathematical equation for sex?

"The sum of the cum is directly proportional to the angle of the dangle and inversely proportional to the square of the mass of the ass!"

Pm me for tutoring practice practice practice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[alterego1]

I have no problem with thoughtful and deep screening. Safety should not be taken lightly. Just don't lecture me on it. Have a great day.

[KenMonk]

I've always had a problem giving out personal info but that is just me. It depends on how personal to be honest. I have p411, i have several references from well known and respected ladies so I haven't had anyone ask me for really personal information.

Now there are a few ladies who know what I do, and know more about me than I would have ever expected, but I have been talking with them for awhile and I consider them more as friends at this point and not just providers.

[~DolceVitaBentley~]

Ken Monk,
I agree with you 110% and I will take that in as a ok with me.I would not dig in anyone's personal life if I see them frequently active in the hobby.It is just these past couple weeks there is a lot of newbie's with the min amount of reviews by girls I've never heard of with no reviews or reviewed by a first time reviewer.So with that being said it puts me in a place to not trust the newbie or provider that are both verified on sites.

[~DolceVitaBentley~]

Alterego,
I am sorry if you feel I was lecturing.That was not my intentions but I guess I did come off bias.

[alterego1]

No worries. I truly do respect the screening process. It goes with the territory. It actually gives me some amount of comfort that he provider is doing her homework.

[KCQuestor]

Originally Posted by The DarkSide

hmmm i could have sworn that bree commented on this thread and now its gone?

I think you might be confusing this thread with the one by Jaycee Rivers, where both Bree and Sophia posted expressing similar sentiments about new clients.

Originally Posted by LongStick

Cool. dont know why she just didn't update her showcase to reflect her screening requirements.

Good point, LS. Sophia's showcase says "Screening is required send 2 current references" - but now three references isn't even sufficient?

[Kshunter]

Originally Posted by ~DolceVitaBentley~

And please don't contact me unless your ready to give out personal confidential info.

You first....

[Allie_Kat]

All I require are 2 verifiable provider references, I don't want to know your last name or where you went to school.
If you sign your ECCIE pm as 'John' and then your yahoo e-mail as 'James', I'm not going to be happy. Everything must be consistent.

[~DolceVitaBentley~]

Allie,
I was fine with that until I had a few run arounds from people going to the extreme of falsifying web sites to a simple email and the list goes on.They are feeding off the hobby to learn more and step their game up.I did lose some trust after a client had Very reputable references and they failed to leave out important info.Makes me wonder

[bartipero]

If you 3 strict scrutiny gals--you, Jaycee and Bre--have so much business that you can take such prohibitive stances of 'don't contact me without national security clearance' then why advertise at all since you don't need it, and don't welcome the contact? It's not coming across well at all. After what you lay out above I can't imagine who you would accept or who would go to the trouble.

[KSViking]

Originally Posted by Allie_Kat

All I require are 2 verifiable provider references, I don't want to know your last name or where you went to school.
If you sign your ECCIE pm as 'John' and then your yahoo e-mail as 'James', I'm not going to be happy. Everything must be consistent.

Some of us have to have an email that does not have our real name in it to throw off the SOs. I know what you mean though, and would think that most guys would be fine with a little bit of screening.