Modern science can finally explain the right wing/left wing dichotomy

[flinde]

Before anyone reads this article, I just want to point out that I have been an unashamed liberal since way before these groundbreaking scientific discoveries were made:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...eft-right.html

But I still dont know what any of this has to do with the price of puss.

I also want to point out that this research was done in Canada, and what do they know? When was the last time Canada sent anyone to the moon? So maybe its not 100% accurate.

[1NEMESIS]

Originally Posted by flinde

Before anyone reads this article, I just want to point out that I have been an unashamed liberal since way before these groundbreaking scientific discoveries were made:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...eft-right.html

But I still dont know what any of this has to do with the price of puss.

I also want to point out that this research was done in Canada, and what do they know? When was the last time Canada sent anyone to the moon? So maybe its not 100% accurate.

LOL! Hey flinde, I was going to post this a few days back, but since I'm such an incendiary individual, I came to the conclusion that mokoa would toss me out on my ear for it!

I'm sure you know that there are several studies saying the same thing from other universities here in the states and in mental health magazines but political correctness keeps it quite.

[flinde]

Well, I'm glad I got a laugh out of you, my friend. Sometimes I think you take things too seriously.

You know, whenever I start taking things to seriously, I go out and buy myself a blowjob. Keeps things in perspective.

[1NEMESIS]

Originally Posted by flinde

Well, I'm glad I got a laugh out of you, my friend. Sometimes I think you take things too seriously.

You know, whenever I start taking things to seriously, I go out and buy myself a blowjob. Keeps things in perspective.

Well then, that's a credo I can live by!! LOL

[RobbThrobb]

Yeah, that'll be the day. Like most libs the only $ they like to spend is other people's. POSTS:99 REVIEWS:O LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER!

[1NEMESIS]

Originally Posted by RobbThrobb

Yeah, that'll be the day. Like most libs the only $ they like to spend is other people's. POSTS:99 REVIEWS:O LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER!

Throbby!!! Back for more eh?!? Let me edumacate ya' on that lib/spending thing the zombie army likes to repeat ad nauseum. When you do the numbers you find that the biggest welfare queens are overwhelmingly repiggie states!! LOL!


"Take a look at the difference between federal spending on any given state and the federal taxes received from that state. We measure the difference as a dollar amount: Federal Spending per Dollar of Federal Taxes. A figure of $1.00 means that particular state received as much as it paid in to the federal government. Anything over a dollar means the state received more than it paid; anything less than $1.00 means the state paid more in taxes than it received in services. The higher the figure, the more a given state is a welfare queen.

Of the twenty worst states, 16 are either Republican dominated or conservative states. Let's go through the top twenty.

New Mexico: $2.03
Mississippi: $2.02
Alaska: $1.84
Louisiana: $1.78
West Virginia: $1.76
North Dakota: $1.68
Alabama: $1.66
South Dakota: $1.53
Kentucky: $1.51
Virginia: $1.51
Montana: $1.47
Hawaii: $1.44
Maine: $1.41
Arkansas: $1.41
Oklahoma: $1.36
South Carolina: $1.35
Missouri: $1.32
Maryland: $1.30
Tennessee: $1.27
Idaho: $1.21
Does anyone else notice the overwhelming presence of northern "rugged individualist" states, like Alaska, the Dakotas and Montana, along with most of the South? Why it's almost like there's a pattern here or something.

Where can we find liberal bastions California, New York, and Massachusetts? California is 43rd, getting back only $0.78 for every dollar it sends to Washington. New York is 42nd, and one penny better off, at $0.79 per dollar. Massachusetts is 40th, receiving $0.82 for every dollar it sends to DC."

I LIKE YOU THROBBY, YOU'RE THE BESTUS EVER!!!

http://articles.businessinsider.com/...#ixzz1lliW7SnX

[RobbThrobb]

Just because Repubs run the state or are in the majority now doesn't mean they implemented those policies. The democratic party are the ones who started the welfare state. Lets not forget F.D.R. the almighty.

[1NEMESIS]

Originally Posted by RobbThrobb

Just because Repubs run the state or are in the majority now doesn't mean they implemented those policies. The democratic party are the ones who started the welfare state. Lets not forget F.D.R. the almighty.

Democrats did it, huh? Ok, Robb…..

[Grifter]

Then we should all stop sending so much money to washington. As to the amounts note that all those places are low population states. The lower numbers are high population states. So I think thats somewhat misleading. Also that money is not spent by the goverments of those states its spent by the national congress so the state governments polticial leanings really dont apply. Not that a false premise is going to get in your way.