Even Worse Candidates Than What We Have

[Lucas McCain]

I thought our candidates were a joke until I read this: https://apnews.com/article/mexico-sh...470ef8fe25912a. Those two worthless bitches even make Biden and Trump seem like reasonable candidates to me.

I read the article because I was curious to know whether either one of them planned on changing the landscape of much of their country. Says a lot that obviously so many of their citizens are willing to risk life and limb just to get here and leave there...

For those of you who don't care to read the link I provided, they apparently both agreed on this during their debate:

The candidates also discussed rising migration levels to the United States, agreeing that migrants should be protected and respected on their path through Mexico. That contrasted with the security-focused approach pushed by the U.S. government.

How about dumb and dumber, concentrate on why people are leaving and debate that shit!

[Tiny]

Yes McCain, we think we have it bad, but Trump and Biden are both better candidates than the current socialist president of Mexico. And his protege Claudia Sheinbaum is likely to be just about as bad. I would however vote for the opposition candidate, Xóchitl Galvez, for president of the United States over Biden or Trump. She’s right of center on economic issues and left of center on social policies. She’s apparently feisty in a debate too. From your article this is what she told Sheinbaum:

“Claudia, even if you deny it, you are cold and heartless. I would call you the ice lady.”

[Lucas McCain]

I thought they were weak. Why not trick your opponent into challenging the cartels? If you really want to win, you'll no longer have an opponent within 4 hours. What happened to the old saying, "if you are not cheating you are not trying"?

[Daneskold1]

Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

I thought our candidates were a joke until I read this: https://apnews.com/article/mexico-sh...470ef8fe25912a. Those two worthless bitches even make Biden and Trump seem like reasonable candidates to me.

I read the article because I was curious to know whether either one of them planned on changing the landscape of much of their country. Says a lot that obviously so many of their citizens are willing to risk life and limb just to get here and leave there...

For those of you who don't care to read the link I provided, they apparently both agreed on this during their debate:

The candidates also discussed rising migration levels to the United States, agreeing that migrants should be protected and respected on their path through Mexico. That contrasted with the security-focused approach pushed by the U.S. government.

How about dumb and dumber, concentrate on why people are leaving and debate that shit!

So much to buy a pack here. Our gun policy and ridiculous prohibition policies are the cause of most immigration. How are meddling in governmental affairs just about covers the rest. We are a Third World our house. Imagine how bad it must be to want to come here? Sexist patriarchal misogynistic, politically unknowing swine much?