Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace Preston
It is quite the long shot.
I've said it before and I'll say it again-- no matter what happens-- we have a much bigger issue at hand. If no fraud is proven-- half of American will still believe otherwise. If rampant fraud is proven, half of American will still believe otherwise.
The fracture that was once fairly small.... keeps growing.
|
The more that Americans can see and understand through court rulings, the better off we will be. Will everybody be convinced, no because not everybody understands the rules but I do believe there are enough people that voted for Trump, like myself, who will accept these court rulings if they are adequately explained.
My problem with what is going on now, is this notion that "so what if we find fraud in every single state if it isn't enough to overturn the results". That is what will lead to more anger. Admit to fraud when and if fraud is found. Give us the new result after fraudulent ballots have been tossed and if Biden still has the lead, he is the winner. That is the sensible thing to do and I believe that most, not all Trump voters will accept that finding if they see that fraud did happen, it was examined and found that Biden still won but to keep saying there was absolutely no fraud IMHO, is preposterous. To say one thinks there is not enough to overturn the election, I would reluctantly agree but still want to see the process work till the end.
What has the left got to lose? What they have to gain, is getting many of those Trump voters like myself, convinced that the process worked by hearing complaints by the so far losing party and consider their complaints with investigations, recounts where called for and in a few short months, the most Americans we could hope for, will be convinced of who won and who didn't. This will not be everybody for sure but more than we have now I believe.
Last night on Tucker Carlson, he produced a list, not a long list by any measure and surely not enough to overturn any one state but it would be important to the process to investigate and acknowledge this fraud of dead people having voted to convince the Trump voters that this matter is being taken seriously.
Here is the segment. I know because I have been told right here on these pages, that many of you will not listen because you really don't want to consider anything beyond what you already think.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/62092328...#sp=show-clips
Tucker Carlson explains why voter fraud matters, even when it doesn't swing states.
While I do not agree with everything Carlson says in this piece, his point that fraud did happen, should be thoroughly investigated. Have an AG tell me that they took Carlson's list, checked every name on it and tell me whether what he said is true or not and how you arrived at that conclusion and with a full explanation, I will be inclined to believe the AG "if" he or she includes the proof of what he or she is saying and not just a simple declaration that "it isn't true". That will not do.
potential outcome of EC ballots?
