Main Menu |
|
Most Favorited Images |
|
Recently Uploaded Images |
|
Most Liked Images |
|
Top Reviewers |
| cockalatte |
650 |
| MoneyManMatt |
490 |
| Jon Bon |
408 |
| Still Looking |
399 |
| samcruz |
399 |
| Harley Diablo |
377 |
| honest_abe |
362 |
| DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
| George Spelvin |
297 |
| Starscream66 |
294 |
| Chung Tran |
288 |
| lupegarland |
287 |
| nicemusic |
285 |
| You&Me |
281 |
| sharkman29 |
262 |
|
|
Top Posters |
| DallasRain | 71218 | | biomed1 | 66686 | | Yssup Rider | 62385 | | gman44 | 54557 | | LexusLover | 51038 | | offshoredrilling | 49316 | | WTF | 48272 | | pyramider | 46397 | | bambino | 44520 | | The_Waco_Kid | 39161 | | CryptKicker | 37374 | | Mokoa | 36499 | | Chung Tran | 36100 | | Still Looking | 35944 | | Unique_Carpenter | 33348 |
|
|
07-13-2016, 07:28 AM
|
#1
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rails Against Trump.....
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...not-bad-thing/
What she has really shown in this ill advised rant is that her Socialist/Progressive/Democrat agenda comes before anything.
She is willing to support a Lying, MoneyGrubbing, Sexual Predator Enabling, (and now proven inept and stupid), cunt as her candidate??
THIS IS WHY Supreme Court Nominees are such a big issue in this election cycle. We do not need more Justices such as RBG who make decisions based solely on their political idealology and not on the merits of each individule case.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 07:39 AM
|
#2
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
The SCOUS is politically divided, and will probably remain so regardless of who appoints a new member. The trick is to swing the balance so your side wins. They should be entirely neutral and just stick to law.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 07:41 AM
|
#3
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
give me one reason why Ruth "roughing it" Ginsburg shouldn't be impeached?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 07:54 AM
|
#4
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
give me one reason why Ruth "roughing it" Ginsburg shouldn't be impeached?
|
Because the Republicans do not have a large enough majority to vote for conviction.
Best reason I can think of. Otherwise, she has proven, by her very own statements, that she is unfit to serve.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 08:06 AM
|
#5
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 62,385
|
Not exactly a rant, was it? Or a rail...
Reason Number One: Fuck you.
That makes about as much sense as your question, shitstorm.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 08:11 AM
|
#6
|
|
2016 County by County Map
Join Date: Dec 13, 2009
Location: There now. Not here.
Posts: 4,379
|
Can you imagine if Justices Alito or Thomas had said something similar about Shrilley? There would be no end to the calls for them to step down.
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 08:15 AM
|
#7
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 62,385
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...not-bad-thing/
What she has really shown in this ill advised rant is that her Socialist/Progressive/Democrat agenda comes before anything.
She is willing to support a Lying, MoneyGrubbing, Sexual Predator Enabling, (and now proven inept and stupid), cunt as her candidate??
THIS IS WHY Supreme Court Nominees are such a big issue in this election cycle. We do not need more Justices such as RBG who make decisions based solely on their political idealology and not on the merits of each individule case.
|
You are so far off base regarding Ginsburg's fairness it's laughable.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 08:17 AM
|
#8
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 62,385
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Can you imagine if Justices Alito or Thomas had said something similar about Shrilley? There would be no end to the calls for them to step down.
|
The toad Scalia constantly violated the canon of ethics, offering his personal political opinions.
You boys are fucking nuts. Typical Trumpites.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 08:27 AM
|
#9
|
|
2016 County by County Map
Join Date: Dec 13, 2009
Location: There now. Not here.
Posts: 4,379
|
And the calls for him to step down never stopped. So, what's your point?
Besides the one on your dunce cap, typical Shrilleryite. 
|
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 01:31 PM
|
#10
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S
Because the Republicans do not have a large enough majority to vote for conviction.
Best reason I can think of. Otherwise, she has proven, by her very own statements, that she is unfit to serve.
|
you're prolly right, but I can live with a censure.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 01:45 PM
|
#11
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Not exactly a rant, was it? Or a rail...
Reason Number One: Fuck you.
That makes about as much sense as your question, shitstorm.
|
yer asking to get reamed dude. want that?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 03:03 PM
|
#12
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
According to the Washington Post, they can't find a single instance where a sitting member of The SCOTUS made such disparaging remarks about a Presidential Candidate.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 03:53 PM
|
#13
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
First time for having a Jewish grandmother as a member?
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 03:59 PM
|
#14
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
The SCOUS is politically divided, and will probably remain so regardless of who appoints a new member. The trick is to swing the balance so your side wins. They should be entirely neutral and just stick to law.
|
In the long run this has nothing to do with right or left, this has to do with the tradition of justices staying out of politics, the legality of Ginsberg now expected to recuse herself if a case involving either Hillary or Trump comes before the court (remember 2000), and the ethics of three SEPARATE branches of government.
On a side note; today I heard Allen Colmes make the claim that the SCOTUS is Conservative.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
07-13-2016, 04:00 PM
|
#15
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S
Because the Republicans do not have a large enough majority to vote for conviction.
Best reason I can think of. Otherwise, she has proven, by her very own statements, that she is unfit to serve.
|
She did that two years ago when she gave another interview; she said that the law was less important than how she felt about an issue.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
|
Find Ladies |
|
Hot Women |
|
