Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 373
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 267
sharkman29 253
George Spelvin 248
Top Posters
DallasRain70443
biomed160786
Yssup Rider60137
gman4452955
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47648
pyramider46370
bambino40371
CryptKicker37100
Mokoa36487
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35504
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2015, 08:42 AM   #1
loveitdou
Premium Access
 
loveitdou's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 14, 2013
Location: Andorra, Houston, Barcelona and Tuscany
Posts: 6,074
Encounters: 94
Cool NOW WE KNOW! politically Correct defined by the President

Now I am very careful about peoples feelings but refuse to be politicaly correct especially now since i found the 1st & original definition:

This exerpt from the archives at the Truman Museum. It was part of a conversation between President Truman and General Mac Authur who presided over the surrender of Japan. Truman advised Mac Authur not to call them the "little yellow cowards" because it was not politically correct. Mac Authur replies he was not sure what that meant--this is Truman's unedited response>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Washington, D C
2120-September 1, 1945
To: D A MacArthur/C H Nimitz
From: H S Truman
Political Correctness is a doctrine, recently fostered by a
delusional, illogical minority and promoted by a sick mainstream
media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely
possible to pick up a piece of shit by clean end!


So there you go
loveitdou
loveitdou is offline   Quote
Old 05-15-2015, 09:03 PM   #2
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

Harry Truman(D) was old school(D) and brutally honest... unlike Ozombies
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 05-16-2015, 11:03 AM   #3
RedLeg505
Oral Aficionado
 
RedLeg505's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
Encounters: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB View Post
Harry Truman(D) was old school(D) and brutally honest... unlike Ozombies
Neither Harry Truman, nor John F Kennedy could get the nomination in today's Democrat Party.
RedLeg505 is offline   Quote
Old 05-16-2015, 11:30 AM   #4
Mr MojoRisin
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Sep 3, 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 7,567
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLeg505 View Post
Neither Harry Truman, nor John F Kennedy could get the nomination in today's Democrat Party.
Well that's because the puppet masters can't control them.


Jim
Mr MojoRisin is offline   Quote
Old 05-16-2015, 11:39 AM   #5
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLeg505 View Post
Neither Harry Truman, nor John F Kennedy could get the nomination in today's Democrat Party.
That is nothing more than pure speculation on your part. Nothing more, nothing less!

The same could be said that "neither" Abraham Lincoln, "nor" Ronald Reagan and/or Dwight Eisenhower "could get the nomination in today's" Republican "Party."

It does not matter which name(s) or party(s) you fill in the blank with, there is no way to either prove or disprove the unsubstantiated claim.

Perhaps we should refer to it as speculative tit for tat!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 05-16-2015, 04:36 PM   #6
RedLeg505
Oral Aficionado
 
RedLeg505's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
Encounters: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
That is nothing more than pure speculation on your part. Nothing more, nothing less!

The same could be said that "neither" Abraham Lincoln, "nor" Ronald Reagan and/or Dwight Eisenhower "could get the nomination in today's" Republican "Party."

It does not matter which name(s) or party(s) you fill in the blank with, there is no way to either prove or disprove the unsubstantiated claim.

Perhaps we should refer to it as speculative tit for tat!
Ohhh.. you mean like there is no way to prove or disprove the unsubstantiated claim that the Recession would have been tremendously worse if it hadn't been for Obama and his "fixes" and "stimulus" claims?

Funny how that works, isn't it? And yet the Obama supporters toss out that "pure speculation" as if it were fact carved in stone.
RedLeg505 is offline   Quote
Old 05-16-2015, 09:28 PM   #7
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLeg505 View Post
Ohhh.. you mean like there is no way to prove or disprove the unsubstantiated claim that the Recession would have been tremendously worse if it hadn't been for Obama and his "fixes" and "stimulus" claims?

Funny how that works, isn't it? And yet the Obama supporters toss out that "pure speculation" as if it were fact carved in stone.
RedNeckMoFo, I anxiously await any and all documented evidence stating that I am wrong in my claim that "neither" Abraham Lincoln, "nor" Ronald Reagan and/or Dwight Eisenhower "could get the nomination in today's" Republican "Party."

Please don't keep me waiting! Ya' hear?
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 05-16-2015, 10:11 PM   #8
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,137
Encounters: 67
Default

pure speculation is always carved in stone.

Didn't you get the memo, RedNeck?
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 05-17-2015, 12:38 PM   #9
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loveitdou View Post
Now I am very careful about peoples feelings but refuse to be politicaly correct especially now since i found the 1st & original definition:

This exerpt from the archives at the Truman Museum. It was part of a conversation between President Truman and General Mac Authur who presided over the surrender of Japan. Truman advised Mac Authur not to call them the "little yellow cowards" because it was not politically correct. Mac Authur replies he was not sure what that meant--this is Truman's unedited response>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Washington, D C
2120-September 1, 1945
To: D A MacArthur/C H Nimitz
From: H S Truman
Political Correctness is a doctrine, recently fostered by a
delusional, illogical minority and promoted by a sick mainstream
media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely
possible to pick up a piece of shit by clean end!


So there you go
loveitdou
Got a link for this phony story?
Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved