US Appeals Court Legalized Dating Prostitution!!

[frontman667]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5_evpHamxs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieIINLjU0g8





My How To Guide on Committing Legal Prostitution in California

Disclaimer
This posting is protected by First Amendment. This is a make believe story that is for educational purpose only. Not responsible for any conduct or behavior of the reader. Not a substitution for legal advice. Please see a lawyer if you need legal advice.

1. I go on a paid date with the sugar baby. The date could include dinner date, movies, etc. I save the receipts to document the date incase I get charged with soliciting a prostitute.
2. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in USA vs Lynnette HARRIS and Leigh Ann Conley ruled that “If these cases make a rule of law, it is that a person is entitled to treat cash and property received from a lover as gifts, as long as the relationship consists of something more than specific payments for specific sessions of sex.” I lived outside the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals so this will applies to federal instruments like US paper currency, coins, postage stamps, and US Treasury.
3. Once the non-sexual events in a date are over, I can treat the cash and property (federal instruments) as gifts. I decided to use to American Eagle Gold Coin (1oz) by the US Mint to get sexual favors from sugar baby,
4. I tell the sugar baby that the American Eagle Gold Coin is a gift for sexual favors. She can take the coin and not give me any sexual favors but I have the right not to give it to her next time if she doesn’t perform sexual favors. A gift is not a contract so I cannot demand she perform sexual favors. I cannot ask her to return the American Eagle Coin if she doesn’t perform sexual favors for me. This is legal because it is legally impossible for anyone to perform sexual favors for gift. After the non-sexual activities in the date, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals allows the sugar baby to treat federal instruments that have value as gifts rather than income or payments. Black Law’s Dictionary define gifts as “A voluntary transfer of property to another made gratuitously and without consideration”. Bradley vs. Bradly Tax Tex. App. 540 S. W. 2d 504, 511. I cannot be violating California Penal Code 657 (b) for several reasons. First reason is that it is legally impossible for the sugar baby to perform lewd conduct for a gift on the condition that I do not expect her to perform sexual favors. Second reason is that the gift does not create a contract (oral or written) for a lewd act because a gift is not a consideration
It is impossible to hire someone with a gift. Gifts are not exchanges because an exchange requires bartering or trading (See Black Law’s Dictionary definition on exchange). Gifts are not fees, consideration, or payment for services.
All 50 states prostitution statutes criminalizes two elements (a) a contract for sexual services (b) the offer of a contract for sexual services. If gifts are given for sexual favors, it is impossible for the state to meet the burden of proof necessary for a prostitution conviction because no contract or offer of a contract exist.
Gifts for sexual favors could fall in the category of non-commercial sexual activities. Black Law’s Dictionary define commercial as relating to or is connected with trade and traffic or commerce in general. If there is no contract or exchange, then the sexual activity is considered non-commercial (see Lawrence v. Texas).
Giving gifts for sexual favors is a fetish of mine and I cannot stop this crazy fetish. I can argue that I have a constitutional right to this fetish.

[ck1942]

Interesting thesis.

Let us know how you do in the court house after the LEO makes a challenge.

[Stag]

Yeah, THAT'S the guy I want to take legal advice from.

Respectfully submitted,
Stag, Esq.

[dreamvacationdates]

So let me get this right, you're going to pay for 45 minutes of whatever with the non expectation of sex for 15 minutes, but if she decides to have sex since it's considered a gift it can't be considered payment for sex.
remember the key is the primary reason and time together is not for the sexual aspect for it to be a gift, I don't think many guys would be interested in spending their money/ time ratio to get it classified as a gift. nor do I think most guys want to get written records of the "dates" or even wanting to take them out on dates to make it look like most of the time was spendt for something other than sex.

[frontman667]

This don't apply to escorts because the courts rule that escort services is not an intimate relationship because escorts don't choose their client. The court rule that escort service is a business not a intimate relationship. IDK, INC vs COUNTY OF CLARK 836 F.2d 1185