Democrat Fake News Media (CBS) Edits Kristi Noem's Comments About Kilmar Abrigo Garcia. Compare The 2 Videos. See For Yourself.

[HoHound]

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1962261388962787461

Noem brought her own camera man just in case CBS tried this stunt.

The longer you trust the deep state corporate media, the dumber the rest of us think you are. Silly Democrats

[Salty Again]

... CBS - once again with MORE fakery! ... Dan Rather must be
very proud. ...

#### Salty

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Dunno 'bout you, but alls I see here is a Golden Opportunity.

Trump will likely get $15-$20 Million from them.
Certainly will have to shed another lefty, late night host or two.
Too bad it wasn't ABC. Might have been able to shed Jabba "Whoopie" the Hutt from the view.

Yup, all upside coming from it - IMHO.
Smart on Noem to bring her own crew too.

[ICU 812]

Their news fakery goes deep into the corporate DNA and is not limited to trick editing.

This fake news shit with CBS goes back as far as the 1970s when they were caught faking a car crash to "prove" that a particular make and model of car would expose from a rear end collision.

Today, with the courts amenable to defamation and so on, it looks to me that CBS just stepped on their own dick.

[Salty Again]

... I do understand that CBS may film a 40 minute interview with somebody,
and then have to fit just 20 minutes of it into the broadcast.
So THAT would leave some of the interview NOT shown.

... But it's STILL no surprise the CBS surely seems to fancy
showing onley the "clipped-out" parts that favour whatever narrative
- true or not - that CBS is peddling.

... How Sad...

#### Salty

[txdot-guy]

How much of what she said can be proven true. Sounds like a bunch of unproven accusations to me.

Should ethical news organizations be compelled to publish every piece of propaganda that the government spews especially if they can’t verify the information provided?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

How much of what she said can be proven true. Sounds like a bunch of unproven accusations to me.

Should ethical news organizations be compelled to publish every piece of propaganda that the government spews especially if they can’t verify the information provided?

amusing that you also discounted CBS completely redoing comments by Harris after they released a promo with her original answer. what they broadcast wasn't even her original answer edited, it was completely different taken from a different question.



the real question you need to ask is should ethical news organizations intentionally edit out content they don't agree with politically?


you know the answer

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

amusing that you also discounted CBS completely redoing comments by Harris after they released a promo with her original answer. what they broadcast wasn't even her original answer edited, it was completely different taken from a different question.

the real question you need to ask is should ethical news organizations intentionally edit out content they don't agree with politically?

you know the answer

Actually that’s not true. The edited footage was taken from the exact same answer just shortened for time. And everything that was said by Harris is true.

You can see the difference here.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-lawsuit.html

What Kristi Noem did was tell unverified statements to push the narrative that Kilmar Abrigo Garcia is somehow an evil criminal gang member and pedophile with no proof whatsoever. Presumably as a sop to the MAGA faithful.

The sad thing is that if the Trump administration would just stop lying and trying to defend their mistakes (by lying) they could have quietly deported Garcia months ago.

It’s so sad that the people in the Trump administration are so bad at their jobs.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Actually that’s not true. The edited footage was taken from the exact same answer just shortened for time. And everything that was said by Harris is true.

You can see the difference here.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-lawsuit.html

What Kristi Noem did was tell unverified statements to push the narrative that Kilmar Abrigo Garcia is somehow an evil criminal gang member and pedophile with no proof whatsoever. Presumably as a sop to the MAGA faithful.

The sad thing is that if the Trump administration would just stop lying and trying to defend their mistakes (by lying) they could have quietly deported Garcia months ago.

It’s so sad that the people in the Trump administration are so bad at their jobs.

the sad thing is that if the Democrats and the media hadn't tried to make a wife beating junior monk wanna be gangbanger mule runner (you have seen the traffic stop in TN video yes?) into mother Teresa he would be deported now.


it's so sad that the Democrats and liberal media are so pro illegal immigrant criminal that it's killing Americans and they don't care.


now about that cunt Leslie Stahl. we've hashed that out and Stahl claim is a lie. here's once again the incontrovertible proof. the video ..


https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=106...9&postcount=25


this wasn't edited for time/brevity as Stahl claims. the answer was COMPLETELY REPLACED with a different answer.

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

How much of what she said can be proven true. Sounds like a bunch of unproven accusations to me.

Should ethical news organizations be compelled to publish every piece of propaganda that the government spews especially if they can’t verify the information provided?

She should have said "alleged" instead of saying he actually did those things. Maybe she's right and maybe she's not, who knows. The fact that they were unproven accusations may have been what tipped CBS not to post that part. The whole uncut interview with Noem was about 15 minutes, which is too long for a Sunday Morning show, so as Salty said, they had to cut something.

If I were the editor, I would have left it in, because it makes for more entertaining television. It sells commercials! That's why Fox News gets more viewers than CBS news. And why Fox paid $787.5 million for slandering Dominion Voting Systems while CBS got off for only $16 million for maligning Trump. As one of my high school coaches said, "go big or go home," and "no pain, no gain."

The CBS announcer should have been fast enough on his feet to state the allegations were unproven.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

the sad thing is that if the Democrats and the media hadn't tried to make a wife beating junior monk wanna be gangbanger mule runner (you have seen the traffic stop in TN video yes?) into mother Teresa he would be deported now.

now about that cunt Leslie Stahl. we've hashed that out and Stahl claim is a lie. here's once again the uncontroversial proof. the video ..

https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=106...9&postcount=25

this wasn't edited for time/brevity as Stahl claims. the answer was COMPLETELY REPLACED with a different answer.

^^^Total Bullshit^^^

All democrats want is for the Trump administration to stop breaking norms and to follow the law.

We are not glorifying illegal immigrants but rather the Trump administration is actively vilifying them and working as hard as they possibly can to obstruct the actual legal immigration process.

And I find Leslie Stahl to be a hell of a lot more truthful and ethical than a talk show host like Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report”.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

All democrats want is for the Trump administration to stop breaking norms and to follow the law.

he is following the Law the Democrats are complaining about due process yet said nothing when two Democrats Obama and Clinton did the same to mass deport illegals

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

We are not glorifying illegal immigrants but rather the Trump administration is actively vilifying them and working as hard as they possibly can to obstruct the actual legal immigration process.

.

yes you are by obstructing the legal authority of Trump to deport these illegals and every sanctuary state/city is in violation of Federal Law and therefore the real obstruction

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

And I find Leslie Stahl to be a hell of a lot more truthful and ethical than a talk show host like Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report”.

you refuse to believe the evidence. attack the messenger. the video is clear. it's incontrovertible proof the answer was completely replaced. it was from a more general question that had to be edited out because then in the final broadcast you'd have Harris giving the EXACT SAME ANSWER to TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS.


See the problem with that?

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

he is following the Law the Democrats are complaining about due process yet said nothing when two Democrats Obama and Clinton did the same to mass deport illegals

He is not. They broke the law when they deported Garcia to El Salvador in the first place. Then they broke the law when they couldn’t get him back. Then they were in contempt of court when they ignored the judge’s ruling to get him back.

yes you are by obstructing the legal authority of Trump to deport these illegals and every sanctuary state/city is in violation of Federal Law and therefore the real obstruction

They are not. There is no law that requires city, county or state governments to provide assistance when dealing with border patrol.

you refuse to believe the evidence. attack the messenger. the video is clear. it's incontrovertible proof the answer was completely replaced. it was from a more general question that had to be edited out because then in the final broadcast you'd have Harris giving the EXACT SAME ANSWER to TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS.

This is a lie. Watch the full video I provided in my original post.

But, Stahl emphasized that both programs - 60 Minutes and Face the Nation - merely used different portions of the same answer to accommodate their differing formats.

'But that isn't what we did. We just ran two different halves of the same answer,' she affirmed.

I trust Leslie Stahl more than you as well.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

But, Stahl emphasized that both programs - 60 Minutes and Face the Nation - merely used different portions of the same answer to accommodate their differing formats.

'But that isn't what we did. We just ran two different halves of the same answer,' she affirmed.

I trust Leslie Stahl more than you as well.

... That the same Leslie Stahl? ... The one who told
President Trump and America that the Hunter Biden laptop
was Fake? ... Really NOT surprised to see you trust her. ...

... Not much different from what CBS did to Kristy Noem.
CBS always must push their-own bullshit narrative
over everything else.

#### Salty

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Tiny

She should have said "alleged" instead of saying he actually did those things. Maybe she's right and maybe she's not, who knows. The fact that they were unproven accusations may have been what tipped CBS not to post that part. The whole uncut interview with Noem was about 15 minutes, which is too long for a Sunday Morning show, so as Salty said, they had to cut something.

If I were the editor, I would have left it in, because it makes for more entertaining television. It sells commercials! That's why Fox News gets more viewers than CBS news. And why Fox paid $787.5 million for slandering Dominion Voting Systems while CBS got off for only $16 million for maligning Trump. As one of my high school coaches said, "go big or go home," and "no pain, no gain."

The CBS announcer should have been fast enough on his feet to state the allegations were unproven.

Fox News the channel gets more viewers because they program opinion programs which are both highly slanted and highly uninformative.

I like to watch the news without all the bullshit that doesn’t need to be there.

The Fox news channel is straight up conservative propaganda.