Quote:
Originally Posted by Cee
Saw her today. It's the same Kelly from way back... Everyone needs to chill out. Great session as always... I've known her for many years and never known her to be "whack". She is back from Seattle for good.
She even told me that this post is hurting her business because some clients think she is LE... She is not. Put a fork in this thread. She did tell me that her partner did ask for a photo because they weren't sure if it was an old client or not. Remember - providers have to be just as cautious as the clients do....
|
Since she is operating in the Sting Capital of Harris County and using a seriously outdated pic in her ad .... she should realize that there may be questions especially depending on her attitude in the process of "qualifying" a customer. This "security" business works both ways .... particularly in Pct 4 country.
May be asking for a pic hurts her business and not her concern she is being tainted as "LE" ... I'm comfortable with the notion that I'm not the only poster on here who is or would be uncomfortable providing a recent photo on the way to the appointment when the pic used by the provider is NOT RECENT.
Since you are her spokes person, my apologies to her if someone was also cautious, but I do not apologize for being careful.
Her pic is fake. This is what I posted:
Quote:
#1: The pic is "stale."
#2: Out of town phone linked to no pic out of state ads.
#3: Wants a pic before any appointment setting.
|
I was being kind when I said "stale" as in outdated and used in ads previously when she was out in the 249 area ... easily "mined" by LE. And BTW I asked her if her pic was current!! 3rd alert .... lied to me.
I appreciate your enthusiasm for championing her cause and trying to quell any observations ... but your efforts merely caused a resurfacing of a "suggestion" of being cautious.
Proceed with caution!
