Does agreeing with Whispers automatically make you his lackie? Does standing up for a provider automatically make you a pussywhip?

[Beagle]

My answer to both questions.....no. I'll elaborate later. Don't want to influence anyone else's reply for now......

[Guest032716]

No, I would just say agreeing with Whispers makes you look like what you are! Standing up for anyone that is being bullied makes you a man! As for me, I have no problem getting pussy because my Benjies speak volumes!

If you can't figure that out, you need to fuck more women!

[sms918]

agree, no to both.


agree or disagree, no one is right or wrong all the time. totally different definition of lackie. any person making decisions on their own is not a lackie, blind obedience is

not sure why guys think it's wrong to stand up for providers( some guys act like their not women or just a piece of meat).

it's sad anonymity on the internet gives people the idea that they don't have to act civilized.

[Beagle]

Originally Posted by Louigi

No, I would just say agreeing with Whispers makes you look like what you are! Standing up for anyone that is being bullied makes you a man! As for me, I have no problem getting pussy because my Benjies speak volumes!

If you can't figure that out, you need to fuck more women!

Appreciate the input and thank you for not starting off with some trash talk. On the issue of bully vs bullied.....I can understand why so many carry that perception. More on my thoughts later....

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by sms918

agree, no to both.

agree or disagree, no one is right or wrong all the time. totally different definition of lackie. any person making decisions on their own is not a lackie, blind obedience is

There is no blind obedience in the people that agree with me... There is a mix that includes people that have argued the opposite side of points with me for years.... Those that agree and disagree change in light of a topic...

not sure why guys think it's wrong to stand up for providers (some guys act like their not women or just a piece of meat).

There is nothing wrong in standing up for a lady, even if the lady is a provider. The automatic supposition that many here have that these ladies are defenseless and NEED you to stand-up for them is ludicrous. In many cases the lady is making mid 6 figure tax free income.

Some need to learn when to separate the "lady" from the business and realize that it is the business being questioned/attacked, not the lady.

I have and will stand up for ladies when warranted, even those that are providers.

it's sad anonymity on the internet gives people the idea that they don't have to act civilized.

There are a lot of keyboard warriors but anyone that thinks I hide behind a keyboard is sadly mistaken. I attend parties hosted locally by a couple of ladies as well as host parties that are not difficult to get an invite to. I have sat down for lunch and/or a drink with many people that I have disagreed with over the years.

SFK is one of those that truly embodies the point here. He has followed me around threads for years taking the opposite side of dozens of issues.... He just so happens to agree with me on this particular issue.

Beagle is the same way. If he agrees he speaks up. If her disagrees he speaks up.

There are far too many though that feel the need to champion a hooker simply for the attention they might get from others without regard to the issues..... That has been happening a lot lately. It is easy to see which ones might actually be open to a conversation and agree to disagree, Sandy for example.....vs those that are simply going to go to the mat convinced that a whore is still a lady and a lady is helpless and needs them to defend her....

Obviously my answers are also No to each question.

[Guest070316-1]

No to both. It's about the bottom line and any principles which can be learned, created, and abided by for future information exchange. Non bias would be better for greater debates or all even. We are all in this together. One side or another. Leaving names out would produce greater results perhaps?

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by Dr. Dew

No to both. It's about the bottom line and any principles which can be learned, created, and abided by for future information exchange. Non bias would be better for greater debates or all even. We are all in this together. One side or another. Leaving names out would produce greater results perhaps?

leaving names out however defeats the basic purpose of the board. It is meant to be about the ladies being evaluated and reviewed and their business practices disclosed.

There are those though that believe that only positive information and Yes reviews have a place here


When someone happens to agree with me there are those that don't bother to stop and take a look and see what it is that swayed that person's opinion. They are just set upon by a group that is used to being able to shout down their opposition. You see it happen to others in the review section regularly.....

too many people cannot pause and consider that not everyone connects on the same level and two different people may have two totally different experiences.

and this is a business that takes it's toll on people on both sides of the experience. Good provider DO go bad at times.

[Guest112916]

Arguing on an internet Escort Board makes all parties pathetic.

[Beagle]

Originally Posted by Von Spieler

Arguing on an internet Escort Board makes all parties pathetic.

Heh! I beg to differ......why would you view ECCIE differently from any other forums? Unless......you have disdain for members in the hobby. Forums are an avenue of information exchange, and when conflicting opinions arise, it's only natural that both sides debate to seek clarity......no?

[Guest061815-1]

Attachment 317683

[Dice man1983]

Be nice people. Mean people suck nice girls swallow

[Guest092514]

no to both is my answer

[gfejunkie]

Lackie?

Not necessarily.

Jack-booted thug?

Possibly.

[JohnnyYanks]

Yes. No. Fucking duh.

[JohnnyYanks]

Originally Posted by Von Spieler

Arguing on an internet Escort Board makes all parties pathetic.

Thus moderating, for free (pussy?), said arguments must take pathetic to a whole new level, no?