Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Yeah, but isn't it ironic how the biggest misogynist on this board - Asswipe the sniveling pig, the dipshit who regularly melts down, froths at the mouth and goes off the rails at providers or anyone with an "axe gash" who dares to post here - is going to vote for the biggest CUNT on the planet?
GO FIGURE!!!
I mean, what the fuck! That's almost as hard to fathom as how that same shrill lesbian feminazi CUNT could enable, defend and stay married to a cheating sexual predator like Slick Willy! Is that how a good feminist is expected to behave?
You're such a lameass barrow pig. I can't speak for anyone else dumbfuck. It's Mano vs Piggie. Trump wins you're gone for 120. Waddle along you cockstalking, cocksucking barrow pig.
Barrow pig ! No wonder he and woomby the EUNUCH were such good " friends " here ! And no wonder why the current EUNUCH in residence, EKIM, WK so much for the BARROW ! So they all have that and waving the rainbow fag flag in common !
Yeah, but isn't it ironic how the biggest misogynist on this board - Asswipe the sniveling pig, the dipshit who regularly melts down, froths at the mouth and goes off the rails at providers or anyone with an "axe gash" who dares to post here - is going to vote for the biggest CUNT on the planet?
GO FIGURE!!!
I mean, what the fuck! That's almost as hard to fathom as how that same shrill lesbian feminazi CUNT could enable, defend and stay married to a cheating sexual predator like Slick Willy! Is that how a good feminist is expected to behave?
Axe gash?
Link? Ask your Bro, lying twatwaffle! I see you're both doing your patriotic duty supporting human sex slavery!
Link? Ask your Bro, lying twatwaffle! I see you're both doing your patriotic duty supporting human sex slavery!
LMAO!
LMAO at YOU! pig. there you go again with that sex slavery crap. what makes you so certain every asian chick working at an AMP in Dallas or Austin was snatched up off the streets of Seoul and shanghaied off to work the AMPs?
can you prove that piggie? sounds like those AMP girls wouldn't take your money. they don't like fat smelly pigs. and let's face it, if you get turned down at an AMP you are real lowlife.
been reading too many Austin Observer articles? you know .. where because the girls live there that they must be being held against their will?
right! idiot. and of course, hypocrite that you are, you are just fine with getting a happy ending after your fbsm aren't ya? aren't you contributing to the sex trade when you do that piggie? just because it's a non-asian makes it ok?
if you know what to look for, you can spot the dallas amp girls out for an afternoon of shopping at the Galleria. no chains, no sinister asian mobster following them around.
they'll be buying their hot little asain butts off! they tend to like ..
LMAO at YOU! pig. there you go again with that sex slavery crap. what makes you so certain every asian chick working at an AMP in Dallas or Austin was snatched up off the streets of Seoul and shanghaied off to work the AMPs?
can you prove that piggie? sounds like those AMP girls wouldn't take your money. they don't like fat smelly pigs. and let's face it, if you get turned down at an AMP you are real lowlife.
been reading too many Austin Observer articles? you know .. where because the girls live there that they must be being held against their will?
right! idiot. and of course, hypocrite that you are, you are just fine with getting a happy ending after your fbsm aren't ya? aren't you contributing to the sex trade when you do that piggie? just because it's a non-asian?
if you know what to look for, you can spot the dallas amp girls out for an afternoon of shopping at the Galleria. no chains, no sinister asian mobster following them around.
they'll be buying their hot little asain butts off! they tend to like ..
if you want, they are slaves ... to this ..
but then again, aren't we all? hahahahahah
SNICK
Let's send WTF over there to slap the SHIT out of Axe Gash...
this is no shoe in for the HildeWhore piggie. not by a long shot.
Donald Trump may actually become the next president of the United States.
With Tuesday night’s primary in Indiana now in the history books, Donald Trump has extended his delegate lead over his nearest rival, Ted Cruz. And just hours ago, in a relatively stunning announcement, Cruz himself has ended his campaign.
It is now guaranteed that one half of the November 2016 presidential election will be Donald Trump and whomever he selects as his running mate. Trump and Ohio governor John Kasich remain the final two contenders on the Republican side — and there is zero chance of Kasich earning the nomination as he still trails behind even Marco Rubio (scroll down on this page), despite the latter’s exit from the racenearly two months ago.
So a few significant questions remain, particularly on the Democratic side of things. The most obvious question is who Trump will be running against, but as Bernie Sanders has won the Democratic primary in Indiana, perhaps the more important question is what this does as far as Sanders’ chances going into the final contests.
Clearly, the delegates Sanders won Tuesday are not going to cut into Hillary’s lead by any appreciable amount, but there’s something more important at stake: The heart and soul of the Democratic Party. A blog on The Huffington Post dated March 28 officially called on Hillary Clinton to forfeit the Democratic nomination to Bernie Sanders. At issue is the fact that the FBI may be on the verge of filing criminal charges against the Democratic front-runner over her private E-mail server and classified communications potentially stored on it.
There are a couple of ways this can potentially play out. First and most obviously, criminal charges could be filed. That should be a campaign-ender right there; however, the question remains whether or not Hillary would actually overcome her stubbornness and actually drop out, or if she would remain bull-headed enough to drag the entire party and her supporters through the mud right along with her as she fights the indictment.
Secondly, should the FBI not choose to indict Clinton, Trump and the Republican Party can still use the probe against her. Can a former Secretary of State who was the subject of a criminal investigation into the mishandling of top-secret material be trusted with national security? Did the Obama Administration refuse to indict her because of the fact she was President Obama’s Secretary of State? The latter question in particular has the potential to add the stench of government corruption to President Obama’s legacy, which could be immensely damaging over the next six months until Election Day. In the type of political climate the United States is facing — a seemingly total rebuke of establishment politics on the Republican side and a revolt against the Clinton legacy and big money in politics on the Democratic side — these are not the kinds of issues that any candidate wants to face going into a general election.
The Democratic Party, like it or not, is at the crossroads over where it wants the party to go in the future, as well as where it wants the nation to go. Should the party continue on its path to effectively anoint Hillary Clinton over the extremely vocal movement on the side of Bernie Sanders, they risk alienating the Sanders voting bloc for years. In particular, as Sanders can likely count on a large contingent of Independent voters, the Democratic Pary stands to lose much of that support should they anoint Clinton to the proverbial throne. Should this happen, the party will likely have a difficult time winning their support for a long time to come; after all, the message will have been that their views and opinions do not matter, as long as they get Big-Money Clinton into the White House.
And what does that say about the Democratic Party’s ideas on where to lead the United States as a whole? Whether or not the DNC wants to admit or acknowledge the Sanders movement, there is a very loud, sizable chunk of the American public which is done with Hillary Clinton; they are done with her lies, her big money politics and ties to Wall Street, her war-mongering, her hypocrisy, and her “I don’t give a damn, I’m going to be the first woman President of the United States” attitude. So while we witness the possible collapse of the Republican party as Donald Trump comes within striking distance of the White House, we may yet witness the disintegration of the Democratic Party should either Hillary be indicted, or the DNC continue its path to anoint her to the nomination in direct opposition to Bernie Sanders’ political revolution. Whatever happens going forward, one thing is indisputable: American politics, and our two-party system, will never be the same again.
Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
After the departure of Ted Cruz and John Kasich, Donald Trump is now the Republican candidate for president. For many in the party, this will be the “Trumpacolypse,” as a Twitter hashtag has it. His unfavorable ratings are at 65%––70% with women, and up to 80% with blacks and Hispanics. With those numbers, a Clinton victory is assured, according to three-quarters of Republican “political insiders” polled by Politico.
Such hysteria six months out from the general election is premature. Much of it reflects the Republican political class’s distaste for the New York real estate developer, reality television star, and braggadocios conspicuous consumer. Trump has violated every canon of presidential campaigning, and scorned all the received wisdom that pundits and prognosticators reflexively dispense. He says what “you can’t say,” and says it in a brutal manner ––“lyin’ Ted” and “crooked Hillary”––that gives many “political insiders” the vapors. In their darker moods, they brood over the possibility of fascism coming to America, or a return of Joseph McCarthy. His biggest offense, though, is that he wins without their help.
They may be right about Trump losing the general. But such a prediction at this point is a guess. Polls record the transient impressions of the people who are polled. Then there’s the “shy Tory” phenomenon, the reticence of people to state their true preference even to an anonymous pollster, leading to a mismatch between the poll numbers and the actual votes. In the last six primaries before Indiana, Trump’s percentage of the vote averaged eight-and-a-half points higher than the polls, according to the New York Times. Of course, if Trump’s favorability numbers are still as dismal on in Octoberr, his defeat will be more certain.
But Trump has consistently disproved conventional wisdom. The old electoral truisms may not apply. Take the clichés about Hispanics. For nearly a decade we’ve been told that the Republicans needed to cultivate this “fastest growing demographic group,” as Obama warned everyone in 2012. The party wise men counseled Republicans to drop the harsh rhetoric about illegal aliens and reach out to the 9% of voters who are Hispanic and allegedly “natural conservatives.” Heeding this advice, Senate Republicans toyed for a while with “comprehensive immigration reform,” which many voters decoded as “amnesty” for lawbreakers stealing their jobs. Yet in most polls, “immigration reform” is consistently low on the list of issues that concern Hispanics.
That didn’t stop some in the party from angering much of the white working class, 36% of the electorate, just to pursue this electoral will-o-the-wisp. About a third of those voters voted Democrat in 2012, but evidence suggests that many are shifting to Trump this year. So Trump speaks to their concerns about ICE’s “catch-and-release” of felons, the hundreds of Americans murdered by illegal aliens, the quality-of-life crimes making many neighborhoods and cities unlivable. Trump promises to put a stop to “sanctuary cities” that blatantly disregard federal law and get away with it. He gets their anger at seeing protestors, like those in Irvine last week, attempting to stop their right to assemble and waving Mexican flags, or the demonstrators in Indiana Monday arming their children with F-bombs to hurl at Trump supporters.
And he especially understands how sick many Republicans and Democrats are of the snotty rhetoric from some leaders and pundits of both parties. From their tony enclaves far from the daily disorder and mayhem caused by our immigration failures, they suggest that such complaints reflect bigotry and xenophobia. So Trump promises to round up the illegals, build a wall on the border, and make Mexico pay for it. And I’ll wager that the pollster’s net doesn’t catch significant numbers of voters who sit at home and shout their approval at the television screen and will pull the lever for Trump come Election Day.
In fact, despite his hard words for illegal aliens, there is growing evidence, much of it anecdotal at this point, that significant numbers of Hispanics and blacks like Trump and may vote for him. Here in the San Joaquin Valley, ground zero for Mexican immigration, one more and more frequently runs into working-class Mexicans who admire Trump for his macho bluster and willingness to slap down politically correct gringos with their superior airs and class snobberies. It’s not just white conservatives who have grown sick and tired of the credentialed class telling them how to live and then demonizing them for disagreeing. No one knows how many Hispanics will vote for Trump, but I’ll wager it will be more than voted for Romney.
But Trump is ignorant and incoherent when it comes to policy, the critics say. Contrary to the commentators cocooned in their social and cultural enclaves, elections are not about policy. The majority of voters don’t carefully study the issues, pore over policy papers, and objectively weigh various proposals in order to arrive at the best choice. They are motivated by their “passions and interests,” as Madison understood. “Interests” are about “property,” or in our time, jobs and the economy. Years of sluggish growth, lower workforce participation, and the investor class waxing fat the whole time have angered a lot of people, including Bernie Sanders’ supporters. Trump’s tirades against free-trade-agreements and China’s currency manipulation speak to these frustrations.
The “passions” we see seething through a Trump rally are the anger at elites of both parties who for years now have talked down to the people, dismissed their legitimate concerns, and sneered at their ignorance, even as they pander to privileged minorities or appease the Democrats. They see criticism of Trump, whether intended or not, as criticism of themselves, yet another patronizing dismissal of their grievances. The backlash against political correctness that Trump has brilliantly exploited is the obvious focus of this anger at politicians who are supposed to be on their side, but who always find excuses to cede the high ground to the other side. Why else would the Senate confirm Loretta Lynch as Attorney General, especially after she told the Judiciary Committee that she viewed Obama’s unconstitutional amnesties as “legal”? Was it because she was eminently qualified, or because she is a black woman?
Some will dispute these assertions as misleading or false, but whether they are true or not is irrelevant. Politics is about perception. How else did a cipher like Barack Obama get elected twice? In 2008 he was perceived to be a racial healer, the smartest president ever, a “no red state, no blue state” unifier, and a brilliant orator. None of these perceptions turned out to be remotely true. The second time it was partly because 81% of voters perceived him to “care about people like me,” while only 18% felt the same about Mitt Romney, one of the most fundamentally decent and kind men ever to run for president. Trump seems to get that perceptions and passions come first, and policy can be figured out later. To a greater or lesser degree, this has pretty much been true in all presidential elections. Trump has simply discarded the decorum that camouflages the truth about political sausage-making.
But can he defeat Hillary? Sure he can. A lot depends on events. A terrorist attack in mid-summer, bad economic news, telegenic violence a the conventions, the FBI report on the investigation into Hillary’s private server, the Attorney General refusing to follow the FBI’s recommendation to indict, or something else we can’t foresee could determine the election. Remember, in 2008 at the beginning of September John McCain was leading Obama in most polls, despite battling the headwinds from a media functioning as Obama’s press agent. And then Lehman Brothers collapsed.
Equally important for November is Clinton’s astonishing incompetence as a candidate. Fifty-five percent of voters view her unfavorably. Her Occupy-Wall-Street pandering to the left has been blatant, and will be hard to walk back in the general. It’s doubtful that she’ll get the turnout from minorities and millenials Obama got. At a time of a populist passion for change and new faces, she’s a tired, old, white professional pol, a habitué of the salons of the rich and powerful. Her campaign has nowhere near the enthusiasm of Bernie Sanders’, while Trump packs thousands into his rallies. The dopey protestors trying to disrupt Trump’s events remind everybody that Hillary’s party created and indulge these two-bit Robespierres. Each wave of the Mexican flag is a big campaign poster for Trump. The “woman card” so far appears a loser when played by a woman who viciously attacked her husband’s sexual victims, and is worth $31 million. Nor has that shriveled satyr Bill Clinton been able to help her out, and he remains a gold-mine of sordid scandal for the Trump campaign. Finally, Trump shows no indication that he will not rhetorically beat Hillary like a rented mule with every scandal and failure of her 25 undistinguished years in the public spotlight.
So yes, Trump can win in November. What he will do as president is another matter.
Trump shows no indication that he will not rhetorically beat Hillary like a rented mule with every scandal and failure of her 25 undistinguished years in the public spotlight.
As per Iffy's excellent post, I hope this is the correct analysis.
The “passions” we see seething through a Trump rally are the anger at elites of both parties who for years now have talked down to the people, dismissed their legitimate concerns, and sneered at their ignorance, even as they pander to privileged minorities or appease the Democrats. They see criticism of Trump, whether intended or not, as criticism of themselves, yet another patronizing dismissal of their grievances. The backlash against political correctness that Trump has brilliantly exploited is the obvious focus of this anger at politicians who are supposed to be on their side, but who always find excuses to cede the high ground to the other side. Why else would the Senate confirm Loretta Lynch as Attorney General, especially after she told the Judiciary Committee that she viewed Obama’s unconstitutional amnesties as “legal”? Was it because she was eminently qualified, or because she is a black woman?
