Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Sarunga · 10-10-2015, 12:07 PM

If Fancy did reveal ANY real-life-info of a member on this board, and if revealing ANY real-life-info (with malicious intent or not) is considered to be outing, which I believe is what GL#5 states, then she can't move away from that.

However, based on my observations of Fancy's behavior on this board, I'm happy to accept that it was done without malicious intent.

Quote:

Originally Posted by oilfieldscum

It really doesn't matter if it was:

a few minutes or not
a "minor" outing or not
a mistake or not

An outing is an outing and me thincks they're all supposed to carry the same penalty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

Zero tolerance does not mean everyone gets the same amount of time away.

Perhaps, this is where 'malicious intent' comes into play.

If the staff determines it was done with malicious intent, then it's a one-year ban; otherwise, a one-month ban.

Sounds reasonable to me.

SpiceItUp · 10-10-2015, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

That is not true...you can talk about your case. There should be no repercussion for telling your side.

The problem is going to be that your side may not match up with the other side and we the member will then be able to choose which side makes the most sense.

It is an inexact science but you can not say that you can not state your case. You can say that you can state your case but you choose not to do so because it will open up the Moderators to state their case and you do not want that to happen. Spice can talk about it because you have opened the door for him to. In fact they have talked about some things that you have said as not being true.

So you can talk about this, you have chosen not to , at least in detail.

Let's be honest here.

^this.

If she wanted to she could reveal every single aspect of what she did and the outcome of it except the specific info that resulted in her ban, specific private communications, and private area content that's not her own.

She could though, for example, use president Barrack Obama's info or some other obviously facetious or famous character to illustrate what exactly was said and we could have a discussion about whether or not that constitutes a violation.

She could also relay in her own words every PM and email she was sent on the matter if she so chooses.

I suspect we will find her unwilling to do so. That's her right, but she can't have it both ways.

Fancyinheels · 10-10-2015, 12:28 PM

Really? Not what I've been told, but there seems to be a lot of that going around, miscommunication.

Nearly everything I have typed so far has been twisted, so I see no reason to bother, especially since I was told to move on. Nobody let me, so I tried again to defend myself, but I should have known better than to engage in a battle no provider on ECCIE will ever win. I'm not good at staying quiet, but I guess I'll have to gird my pretty panties and be the person who shows restraint when everyone else keeps chattering.

Y'all believe what you wish, as you will anyway. I am the Sataness of ECCIE currently, but someone else will eventually be crowned in my place. I wish him or her much luck with a fair trial and execution by public opinion.

SpiceItUp · 10-10-2015, 12:58 PM

Told by whom? You mentioned St. C told you he didn't want to hear about it. That doesn't mean you have to drop it entirely or can't discuss it on the board.

Maybe he did say the latter but I'm fairly certain he didn't, and that's not what you've relayed to us nor have I heard anything behind the scenes which would suggest it. Think I'm libertarian regarding members speaking their minds? He's even moreso! It's a core principle of this board.

Do or do not clarify but don't refrain because you'd have us believe someone is trying to censor you.

dearhunter · 10-10-2015, 01:05 PM

I am always amused by the retards who thinck they can be the one who controls their narrative. When, no one else has ever been able to do so. In 4 or 5 posts Fancy has left a treasure of information to use going forward.

chicagoboy · 10-10-2015, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarunga

However, based on my observations of Fancy's behavior on this board, I'm happy to swallow that it was done without malicious intent.

FIFY.

Sarunga · 10-10-2015, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicagoboy

FIFY with malicious intent.

Thanks.

FoxyNC · 10-10-2015, 02:31 PM

Heh.

chicagoboy · 10-10-2015, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoxyNC

Heh.

Who thincks Foxy has embraced brevity, and will eschew her accustomed longwindedness?

Me neither.

(BTW, my intentions are at least as benevolent as Fancy's were.)

FoxyNC · 10-10-2015, 04:20 PM

I just got done pissing all over my own threAD.

My bladder's empty.

I got nuttin'!

But, I reckon I should play nice... since you are!
You are, after all, responsible for teaching me how to finally Linck properly, if only by example! (Stoopid fkkn coding.. grrr)
Guess I owe ya one!

Island_Gent · 10-10-2015, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoxyNC

I just got done pissing all over my own threAD.

My bladder's empty.

I got nuttin'!

But, I reckon I should play nice... since you are!
You are, after all, responsible for teaching me how to finally Linck properly, if only by example! (Stoopid fkkn coding.. grrr)
Guess I owe ya one!

Ugggggh...why the fuck...I hate you now Foxy...that is until you get here.

WTF · 10-10-2015, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoxyNC

I just got done pissing all over my own threAD.

My bladder's empty.

I got nuttin'!

But, I reckon I should play nice... since you are!
You are, after all, responsible for teaching me how to finally Linck properly, if only by example! (Stoopid fkkn coding.. grrr)
Guess I owe ya one!

Your thread seems to be in correlation with this thread.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1502121&page=5

Gathering data on newbie tricks so you can then cross reference that data and keep those tricks in line all under the guise of safety dovetails with this thread.

How many of those newbie's would give out say their phone number if they knew you were going to cross reference that with their Facebook account , Trulia to match names with their tax records..and once all that information is gathered play a psychological ploy by asking them question letting them know you have detailed information on them to keep them in line...tsk tsk tsk indeed.

GlobeSpotter · 10-10-2015, 04:51 PM

backpage is looking safer every day.

Guest030816 · 10-10-2015, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Island_Gent

Ugggggh...why the fuck...I hate you now Foxy...that is until you get here.

Don't hate the lass, merely because of her proximity. Nor because of her long winded posts. Neither are going to change soon.

dearhunter · 10-10-2015, 08:30 PM

Whores always use the "safety" card to get a fucktards RLI.

Whores can thinck they hold the final word with their "my pussy/my rules"..........welcome to the final word.............Fancy has joined the potty mouth outing club........no mulligan.........no do over.